Called a terrible writer
https://www.giantfreakinrobot.com/ent/tolkien-was-a-terrible-writer.html
I would suggest rather that the terrible writer is the author of the piece, SCKYLAR GIBBY-BROWN. Too bad she doesn't even know how to spell her own first name, but seriously, she praises the book for being such a great example of world building, but by the same token complains about too many descriptions, too many outside rambles and side trips and discursions. Why doesn't a professional editor realize that the two things are different sides of the same coin, that those very things she complains about are exactly what makes the book great? You wouldn't get that kind of believability without them.