I've just seen American History X and he played 'Seth'. He was awful, and it as though he was reading straight off the script, the hatred he was meant to portray was totally unconvincing and looked even worse compared To Edward Norton and Edward Furlongs performances.
Anyone agree?
This message has been deleted by an administrator
shareThis message has been deleted by the poster
shareNah, I think his performance makes him look like an idiot, which is what the character was supposed to be like. I'm a fan of the guy.
shareand your a BAD Observer.
he was great, as always.
~i don't need anything at the bottom of my posts~
That is the point their hatred is something they have been taught. Those are not really their thoughts they have been brainwashed so their hatred is really someone elses words they are repeating.
shareI tought he was brilliant as seth, nailed the part imo
shareYeah I agree with Marti. They don't think any of it is wrong, its a game to them. No-one hates all the time, who wants to see cliched roles in such an amazing film. Ethan is a great guy and actor, and he really played the part well. Because he was a semi nice guy, he made you want to be liked by him because thats in his nature. He added depth to the film.
shareNah not at all beano jack. think he's got a good serious & convincing side as well as a comedic side he played in my name is earl as randy. i give the guy a hell of a lot of credit as well for all the weight he took off. not easy at all especially being heavy myself.
share