You're wrong. He felt forced to co-write and direct the movies that way, because the studio would not allow him to film it the good way he originally wanted, and he was unaware that he could refuse to accept credit for them. His original non-studio-meddled scripts for both movies were immensely superior and would have worked critically, therefore expected to work at the box office. Just because it can occur to YOU that he "could have signed Alan Smithee", does not mean it would have occurred to him as well. Not everybody gets exactly the same idea as someone else when it's convenient. Like I said, those 2 movies (at least the way the ended up for cinemas) were not really his movies.
By the way, Lady in the Water (which was an objectively bad movie) was definitely M. Night's movie, and it's is one (of only 2) of his movies that were real flops.
But did you see anywhere in my first reply saying that Lady in the Water was "not M. Night's movie"? No, you did not. Because I know there was no Studio Meddling involved in that movie; he just felt compelled to take out his insecurities and express his desire for validation, but he didn't have his wise Disney producers to help him get over his problems at the time, so he didn't think things through, which I can forgive ... But we can tell that there was Studio Meddling involved in The Last Airbender and After Earth ... Unlike the final released versions of The Last Airbender and After Earth, Lady in the Water actually had substantial storytelling (stupidly substantial, but substantial nonetheless; substance doesn't automatically mean good stuff) ... and it had brilliant cinematography (because M. Night storyboarded the movie himself, unlike the final released versions of The Last Airbender and After Earth). That's why I'm split halfway in rating the movie.
So your assumption that I was only saying that The Last Airbender and After Earth were not his movies "because they didn't work critically and at the box office" is incorrect.
reply
share