MovieChat Forums > Logan Lerman Discussion > Shouldn't be spider-man

Shouldn't be spider-man


I never really liked this actor. The first time I thought he did good on a role was perks of being a wallflower and then I saw fury which he was also good in. But I personally just don't see him in the role of Peter Parker/spiderman. If they recast the character then they should look at other actors.

reply

This message has been deleted by the poster

reply

I personally don't see how you could watch Perks of Being a Wallflower and not see him as Peter Parker, but anyways, Who would you personally cast as Spider-Man then.

reply

now he will tell you: "zac efron" :D

reply

I don't want Logan Lerman or Zac Efron. Why would someone that dislikes Lerman automatically like Efron? Lerman is a boring choice. But then, Garfield was an interesting choice and that turned out pretty bad. There's gotta be other good actors aged 16-24 that can add something to Spiderman and give him interesting, unique qualities over the other Marvel characters.

reply

Well I love Logan AS AN ACTOR, but even myself can't see him very well as Peter Parker. Anyway, tha's all *beep* since they SEEMS to have decided to take a black guy to play Miles Morales.

reply

I'm saying that apparently, he found less work than a black man in 1930.

reply

Oh, that's a bunch of crap, they are not going the Miles Morales way.

reply

Perks was Logan as Peter Parker *before* he became Spidey. That would be good enough for a full blown origin, but I doubt we're gonna see that.

reply