Anna Faris said Ivan Reitman slapped her ass
Can you blame him?
Such a hot ass in The House Bunny.
https://variety.com/2022/film/news/anna-faris-ivan-reitman-slapped-my-ass-yelled-on-set-1235408324/
Shocking! I believes anyone who make unfound accusation!! we dont need evidense or collaboration!! just say someone did something and we all believe hahahahah.
Poor man is just in grave and his family morning. and actress who is definate NOT washed up, who is definite NOT a nobody looking for attentions, throw this poor man under bus? Shame on this talentless bimbos.
She said around 30 people saw it happen so it’d be easy to confirm.
shareThen she should confirm it, right?
sharewho care. he slap her pancake ass? oooooooooooh! the HORROR!!! hes hitler and stalin & pal pott all in ones!!! you know, when you really thinks about it, a slap is just like rapes hahahahahhahah. he just play around.
this man give us great film ghostbuster. bring joy to million worldwides. what does she do? that right, nothing. and, wait.. he just die. his family devastate. what does talentless bimbo want? he not alive anymore to defend. she try and make him into bad guys to boost shit career.
THIS PERSONALITY IS FUCKING STUPID...SWITCH AGAIN. NOEMOJI
shareI would slap her ass as well.
But yeah, we live in a society in which if you just look at a woman is violence and outright rape.
NO...LOOKING IS STILL FINE...ASS SLAPPING I SOMETHING ELSE,KIDDO. NOEMEOJI
sharecorrekt. victimhoods is an industry in america, it encorage wash up actress to confuse playing around with assault. i bet she laugh it off back then. now career in shitter, playful slap become rape hahahhahaha. gtfo of heres.
shareSo....these 30 people are now....where?
You drugged and r&ped me.
50 people were witness.
Now give me $20 million and all of the land you own, then I might go away.
My lawyer will be in contact very soon to receive payment.
It would be true if that were about a living person. But the guy just died, so there is very little chance this is about money.
On the other hand if she was being disingenuous there won't be a lot of people defending the guy.
The yelling was probably true.
Though the butt slapping I doubt would have 30 witnesses. Even there were 30 people there I doubt they were all paying attention, unless these 2 were posing and acting it up.
> so there is very little chance this is about money.
Or other messed up reasons. Strike while the iron is hot for the biggest impact.
You know what's messed up about people? People themselves.
If somebody cries wolf, firstly you ask where the wolf is.
Unless it's a woman, then you ask where should the money truck dump all the money, because of course, a woman will never lie, or exaggerate for any kind of gain.
Financial or emotional.
>The yelling was probably true.
Because you say so?
Like I said. YOU r&ped me.
It must be true because I said it.
The reason I think the yelling was true, because it was a known technique used by directors.
Like in the military movies the instructors usually insult the new recruits, give them a chance to rebel and beat them down as example, to establish authority.
The film crew is similar, they are just assembled together, the director is like a general, needs his or her orders executed swiftly and without questions. So picking someone to yell is one of such ways to establish authority, especially a replaceable star to yell, in front of most people, so everyone would fall in line.
Or if it was Dwayne Johnson, you let it go so a medium budget Christmas movie ended up costing $250 million.
From what I understand it is quite common, and the "tyrant" comments about directors were also quite common from what I read.
>Like in the military movies the instructors usually insult the new recruits, give them a chance to rebel and beat them down as example, to establish authority. The film crew is similar
oh lord, you're drooling with the amount of spew coming out of your mouth.
>The reason I think the yelling was true, because it was a known technique used by directors.
What you want and hope to believe doesn't necessarily make it true.
>and the "tyrant" comments were also quite common from what I read.
Where? I'm supposed to just take your word on this right? Deliver this "evidence" you have amassed on Ivan Reitman.
https://www.independent.co.uk/arts-entertainment/films/news/ghostbusters-ernie-hudson-howard-stern-b2287110.html
Ernie Hudson said he was great and welcoming. He didn't like the studio.
You seem to have already determined on a side, simply defending a position. Refuse to consider any other possibilities if they do not suit you.
I find it is often pointless to talk to people like that.
Like you said before:
You know what's messed up about people? People themselves.share
>Refuse to consider any other possibilities if they do not suit you.
Oh I was considering. You said you had evidence, I asked for said evidence, and you failed to provide.
Here: "and the "tyrant" comments were also quite common from what I read."
Provide links to where you read them if they were quite common.
>You seem to have already determined on a side, simply defending a position.
So have you, except you're claiming guilty without evidence, without a fair trial.
If it was up to you, the legal system would be based on guilty until proven innocent.
It's often pointless to talking to people like that because they are bored with their lives and just want to see blood for a minute of excitement. I'd prefer to see evidence and proof that somebody is guilty first because careless whispers can ruin innocent lives.
When someone is a public figure, judging them is fair game.
Though I am no longer interested in a discussion, not with someone like you.
Someone like you is just a liability, my opinions of both you and Ivan Reitman are much more negative than before.
Not because you disagree with me, but because you used language like these:
you're drooling with the amount of spew coming out of your mouth.
And if Ivan Reitman is supported by someone like you, then I am pretty sure the guy was an arsehole, because you clearly are. share
>not with someone like you.
Like me, who doesn't burn somebody at the stake without evidence?
You'd be great as Witchmaster General. Lots of burnings and drownings of GUILTY Witches.
If you were in charge the country would be Witch free. Witchless.
>Not because you disagree with me, but because you used language like these:
You forgot the context I quoted above that. You we're literally blabbing.
Look....... -_- I asked you to support your statement:
>>and the "tyrant" comments were also quite common from what I read.
If you've read this multiple times, and it's a common occurrence, thus multiple people have stated it, post the evidence to support your claim.
3rd time of asking!
Edit: ha haaa You edited your comment!!! Way to lose an argument!
You were specifically referring to Ivan Reitman being called a TYRANT. You could not find a lick of evidence, so you went back and changed your comment to "directors".
And you still want to burn this man at the stake!! You're SICK in the head!
I edited that comment after the first time you quoted it. I edited it so it is easier to understand, to avoid any possible confusion. It was not even for your benefit, because clearly you were not confused.
But you kept ignoring that, and kept misquoting it. I don't even know why, the editing did not change the meaning, and nor does it vindicate you now.
But anyway I am tired of your little tricks.
You are clearly just a low life trying to win the argument, you don't give a damn about the truth.
And you are clearly beneath me.