Did you still think he was hot after he went nuts?
He sends off crazy vibes
shareHe definitely became irritating....like a foot fungus.
shareHow true
share
MovieChat Forums > Kirk Cameron Discussion > Did you still think he was hot after he ...
I get so infuriated when he smugly brings up the Crockoduck because all that is proving is his own ignorance.
shareCrockoduck?
shareHis idea of a transitional form is a crocodile gives birth to a half crocodile-half duck, then the “crockoduck” gives birth to a duck. That isn’t even close to how evolution works. Kirk decided before he did any research that God was right, evolution was wrong and now he’s just connecting the dots in the direction he has to to justify the conclusion he already pre-determined. It’s infuriating because he thinks he knows more than actual scientists who are a lot smarter and more experienced than he is.
Assuming humans don’t go extinct then we are going to be transitional forms eventually.
Not really... it was simply highlighting the absurdity to which those supporting evolution should go if they seriously think that all animal today are the sole product of evolution. The reality is evolution would never give you the variety of animals you have today solely through evolution. It takes other external factors to make some of the more dramatic jumps from one animal to the next. Whether it was the hand of god or a random cosmic ray that broke a DNA chain at just the right spot at just the right time, you really need something like that externally impacting animals if you want to ever see them evolve drastically which is what they have done on earth.
shareExcept these aren’t dramatic jumps, they take a long ass time to happen. Kirk seems to think it happens from generation to generation and it doesn’t. I’d love to see your scientific research that confirms “evolution would never give you the variety of animals you see today”, and yes you asserted a negative so you have to prove a negative. An organism is not just going to birth a completely different species.
FYI: The evidence for evolution is overwhelming, it is a scientific theory which is pretty much about as close to objective fact as it gets in science. Christians don’t like it because it contradicts the conclusion that they want.
Exactly.
evolution is pure and utter nonsense.
There is no fossil records of in between species, no matter how 'long ass time' it takes to happen.
the idea that pond scum turned into fish, and eagles that soar, an dinosaures, and whales, and birds, just through random mutations is science fiction. That's some magic pond scum!
and how, may I ask, would pond scum know how to create the human eye? The central nervous system? the brain? Evolutionists reply 'it just did!'
No honey, tis not 'objective fact', its mad hatter madness!
Ummm there are plenty of transitional forms in the fossil record, there are also homologous structures, DNA evidence, etc. evolution has been proven beyond all reasonable doubt just like gravity. Also evolution says nothing about where life came from, you are confused with abiogenesis which has not been scientifically accepted. Evolution also doesn’t say that pond scum turned into fish, you are strawmanning.
And “evolutionists” say it happened with far more evidence than “it just did”. In sexual reproduction there is a process called crossing over where alleles from each gene randomnly assort in various gametes. This causes genetic variation within the species, then due to the environment different traits are favorable while others are unfavorable, this filters out the members that have unfavorable traits while the ones with favorable traits pass on those traits to their offspring. When this continually happens “over a long ass time” it can change the species so that the current organisms are different species than their ancestors thousands to millions of years ago.
I’m sorry it’s not the answer you wanted but that’s your own problem.
its a failed theory, not proved in the slightest, let alone 'beyond all reasonable doubt!'
The fossil record simply doesn't exist.
Where are the giraffes with short necks that died out because the ones with the mutation that gave them longer necks could reach higher trees and lived?
There aren't any.
There aren't fossils between any two species, let alone enormous leaps from a catterpiller to an eagle!
Uhhhh it is very much not a “failed theory”, if it was “failed” it wouldn’t be a theory. Literally all of Biology is based around it.
We have literally found the fossil record.
Uhhhh the giraffes who couldn’t reach their food died out and therefore the gene pool was filtered down to giraffes who had long necks. Seeing how they have long necks they are going to produce offspring who also have long necks so therefore the gene pool is reduced to giraffes with long necks.
Yeah there are.
Here you go, sweetheart: http://www.fossilmuseum.net/Evolution/transitionalfossils.htm. A list of multiple transitional forms leading up to modern day organisms.
Ehhhmmm random things happening like a cosmic ray breaking DNA is actually a part of evolution. It needs random things to happen and then the changes that work for that environment will live on while the ones that don't will not. You don't seem to have a basic understanding of the theory.
share