1. You're assuming the child will care about his father's profession. The man who ends up helping raise that child will be the one he cares about, not some hyped up athlete no one will care about in ten years.
2. She is probably doing him a favor. He won't be immediately known as Tom Brady's bastard son, and he won't have to live up to any silly expectations (if any-no one will care or remember Tom Brady in ten years).
3. They were not married. She had the baby on her own. She carried him for 9 months. She had to take care of herself for 9 months. She couldn't have a drink for 9 months (just in case she drinks). Her body went through stress and changes. http://www.womenshealth.gov/pregnancy/you-are-pregnant/body-changes-discomforts.cfm
I doubt you're tough enough to put your body through that type of hell.
She has every right to name that baby whatever she wants.
4. Your male ego and your misogyny is showing. If you believe in the antiquated practice of giving every child the man's last name, then you should also believe that every man should do right by the woman he impregnates, and do right by every child he helps create.
I'm not saying Tom Brady is not doing right by his child, or that he did anything wrong toward Bridget Moynahan, but there a plenty of men out there who don't care to be accountable for their actions. She seems to be holding herself accountable for getting knocked up, she is taking full responsibility by giving him her last name.
5. Not all women are vindictive, and if that's all you encounter...well, you probably bring it on yourself. You're only as good as the people you date/get involved with.
reply
share