MovieChat Forums > O.J. Simpson Discussion > Think about it.....He is so guilty

Think about it.....He is so guilty

posted 9 years ago by ellino_kanadezo
7 replies | jump to latest

First of....NO ONE (unless you are a psycho path) commits a murder like that....totally something done out of anger....wonder who could have been angry at her (DARN IT, Can't think of anyone)

Secondly, it just happened to be the night that Ron Goldman went to her house to drop off her glasses.....Obviously O.J. was stalking her (if not him as well) saw a young attractive guy go to her place; and got more jealous and well..... Coincidence? highly doubt it.

It's clear he is the murderer.....How could anyone do that to the mother of their own children? and even so; what a loser and a half....there goes his fame....Oh wait...no, he's got fame....but only in a bad way now

[–] TMC-4 9 years ago

He had a history of abuse against his ex-wife,could not explain cuts on his hand, or the fact he owned a pair of shoes identical to the ones the killer wore, and had a heated argument with his ex-wife the day of the killings. The civil trial lawyers tore him a new ass.

[–] SnowFlakeKittens 9 years ago

He was only thinking of his own selfish ass. California people have sh!t for brains when it comes to being on the jury.

[–] stefanschneider441 9 years ago

Yeah but the chewbacca argument is pretty good.

[–] Huge_Ack_Man 9 years ago

Ohhhh Chewbacca did it!!! I suppose Big Bird was his accomplice???

If only OJ had known, he could have avoided wasting so much time searching for the "real" killers out on the golf courses.

jk

If you don't read the newspaper you are uninformed. If you do...you are misinformed---Mark Twain

[–] SnoozeAlarm 9 years ago

>>> could not explain cuts on his hand, or the fact he owned a pair of shoes identical to the ones the killer wore

And lied about owning them - and then footage of him wearing them on national TV comes out!

It is impossible to get a bad gash on your hand and not be aware of it.

Imagine seeing someone covered from head to foot with dog *beep* and then telling you that they don't know how it happened. Unless it happened while you were asleep, which it didn't in OJ's case, it's a lie.

In my mind, these 2 points you raise are perhaps the strongest pieces of evidence against him.

Evacuation Com

[–] catbookss 9 years ago

You're condemning the majority of people in California of having "sh!t for brains." While there are undoubtedly a percentage of people in California who do, same as any other state, that's far too glib an "answer" for the verdict returned in this case.

If we're to judge intelligence by college graduation rates, California rates higher than many other states.

The reality is the prosecution screwed up their case and that's why they lost. They misread the jury, were overconfident because of the vast amount of evidence they had, lost sight of the overview (meanwhile the defense did not), did not take into consideration the racial climate of the times, so so they lost.

[–] SnowFlakeKittens 9 years ago

Yes the ones who let murderers get away with the crime.