If you haven't read his book Outrage, this 7 hour piece on the various flaws in the trial is very entertaining and you'll learn a lot about the American court process from watching it:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S9F90DHsOdg
Even at the time Bugliosi went on record saying that an innocent person would never have behaved the way OJ did.
shareOJ had the motive, the history of violence against Nicole (Search the pictures of her previous beatings), the opportunity and all the evidence pointed to him. Police never found the clothes or knife, theory was he dumped it at LAX. There was just too much evidence against him,
- The blood on the Bronco
- The purchase of the missing knife
- OJ's blood at the scene
- The cut on OJ's finger
- Show prints matching OJ's size and shoe brand
- Blood trail leading to OJ's house
- The Glove - it fits if he even half tries to actually put it on
- The limo driver saw OJ returning to the house after the murders and noticed the Bronco was not there when he arrived - timeline fits.
I'll let you know when I come-up with a new signature, .
Even at the time Bugliosi went on record saying that an innocent person would never have behaved the way OJ did.
I agree. I have heard of instances where legitimately innocent people behaved in ways that they shouldn't have, but those are minor when compared to OJ Simpson's overall demeanor. I remember a television interview (on Charles Grodin's now-defunct cable talk show, if I remember correctly) in which Vincent Bugliosi described Simpson as "the most audacious murderer."