I'm so pissed this guy was cast in the first place, mainly because he's a nasty psychotic *beep*-wit, but he is such an awful adaptation of Peter. Peter is not some timid, spineless, whiney, loser, push-over. His mute, humour-less Spider-Man was just as bad.
I hope his career just continues sinking.
Well.... That's just like.... Your opinion man.
shareRelax, you ass blasted fan of Garfield.
Neither Tobey nor Andrew are ever going to reprise the role of Spider-man again.
Says the overgrown child that comes up with the dumbest reasons to condemn movies or movie performances.
sharePiss of, Luke. You're the pathetic child who hurls around immature insults and masquerades your opinions as fact. You're one of the worst posters on the boards, I've seen some childish posts in my time, but yours are amongst the worst.
If only I had saved your comments with pathetic insults to through back in your face...
Couldn't agree more. Anyone who thinks this has-been was ever a good Spider-Man was probably 8-13 years old when that crap came out.
shareHe was great as spider man Andrew garfield didn't even come close and tom holland won't either
shareI agree toby wasn't a good spider-man but i think that could have been more down to sam raimi though making him that way
shareThe dude abides.
share