The two accusers in the new HBO documentary are not credible.
The accusers in this "documentary" are in the midst of an appeal for their 1.5 billion dollar lawsuit which was dismissed last year by a judge. So, this "documentary" is being used to gain public support and leverage for their appeal. Wade Robson is in financial trouble; hence, his change of tune and this lawsuit.
This "documentary" doesn't provide any evidence. They have to make the allegations as graphic and shocking as possible because that's their only "weapon" and they know the public is gullible and lazy to do research on their backgrounds. They rely on the public to accept only their words because they have no actual evidence.
They also have serious credibility issues. They were adamant for YEARS (even into their adult years) that MJ didn't touch them and Wade testified in Jackson's defense during his 2005 trial. After not getting the job in the Cirque du Soleil Michael Jackson show back in 2011 and suffering a nervous breakdown, that's when Wade had "realized" he had been "molested" by Michael Jackson and then filed a $1.6 billion lawsuit against his estate. So, no, this documentary did not change my mind.
As well, the FBI did a through investigation of MJ for about 10 years, ripped through his home, searched his computers and found nothing. Are the FBI liars? Are they Michael Jackson fans? I provided the links below. As well, he was found not guilty in the 2005 trial for a reason after it was proven that the accuser's family had a shady history of extortion attempts. #extortion
1. https://www.billboard.com/articles/news/266333/michael-jacksons-fbi-files-released
2. https://vault.fbi.gov/Michael%20Jackson
3. https://leavingneverlandfacts.com/facts/