There's something sexy about this woman even though her face is is not objectively beautiful.
shareI think it's her voice but I love Aussie accents. The only flaw I see on her face is maybe her nose is too big. I think she's flawless. She also has great hair. Some of her beauty could be from surgery and good makeup.
shareI'm the opposite - I think she is beautiful, but not at all sexy. She looks uptight.
share
There have always been women that were sexy and not classically beautiful, and vice versa.
One of the things that drives me crazy is a woman's intelligence. That was the *first* thing about my wife that caught my attention even though she's often been described as very pretty. Something about a brainiac..
I find her beautiful but not very sexy.
shareWhere are you getting this 'not objectively beautiful' nonsense?
shareBy looking at her face.
share... and the objectively?
shareHe's mildly retarded, so he's conflating "traditionally" or "classically" with "objectively". Even then it's up for debate whether or not she lacks classic beauty, but obviously "objectively" has little place in discussions of aesthetics
lol, agreed..
share"...obviously "objectively" has little place in discussions of aesthetics"..
You can't be serious!! Objectivity is fundamental to any discussion of aesthetics!
The OP was saying that he personally doesn't find her beautiful. That's him being objective. He, unlike you, recognises that you shouldn't discuss beauty without objectivity. Otherwise it's just a sharing of opinions. Get it?
And are you one of those posers who uses less-common words when a common word will do? If you mean "confusing", write "confusing". "Conflating" was the wrong word.
What's wrong with this use of 'conflating'?
>... conflating "traditionally" or "classically" with "objectively".
The only one who's retarded is you considering your political views.
shareYou don't know anything about my political views. Your world-view is simplistic ("leftist" vs. whatever the hell you consider yourself) because you're simple-minded
You make a fool of yourself almost every single time you run your mouth, whatever the topic. In this case it's about Cate Blanchett and the meaning of objectivity. In another thread it's about Angelina Jolie and preventive medicine. In another thread it's about Zoe Kravitz and [incoherent rambling]. Tomorrow it'll be something else
I know enough with exchanging with you to know you are a moron.
shareYou seem to be scientifically and historically illiterate 🥱
There's only a few white nationalists on here and you are, by far, the most intellectually lazy of the bunch. Look at how many challenges to your OP you are avoiding just in this thread
It's ALWAYS the default defense of contrarians like you to regard others as "morons", it's a defense mechanism. But you don't convince anybody. Almost all of your comments are met with either ridicule or indifference
WN is rational, logical and just. I am so confident in this that I am willing to debate this against the world's biggest sociologists and moral philosophers. I am a WN because I have good critical thinking skills applied to abstract social topics so I'm impervious to conditioning our society has been subjected to on this topic for the last 60 years.
You're just getting on my nerves changing topics and looking at what other people post on different threads so I call you a moron. It's you who changed the topic of this thread from Cate Blacnhe's beauty to politics. Stop caring about what other people write on different threads and get a life.
You don't even seem capable of debating it against randos online. Whatever white nationalism is, you aren't capable of articulating it. You just covered your ears and went "I'm not listening" when I tried explaining to you how that La Griffe link you posted can't be taken seriously if it isn't willing to be transparent about its methodology
If simple concepts like peer-review and falsifiability are insignificant to you then you aren't capable of having an adult debate
I am more aware of what WN is than you. You probably still think it's about oppressing non Whites. La Griffe link I posted is perfectly valid data on Baltimore IQ until you find a better source. And I posted that just for fun, it's not what I base my ideology on. The Black White IQ gap is an undeniable scientific fact going back more than 100 years. You're just in denial because your fragile little liberal mind can't face the unpleasantness of reality that races are actually different.
shareI’m sure Cate cares what you think.
Absolutely genius actor, but I suppose that’s the least of our concerns when there is her appearance to debate. You know, the important stuff 🙄
Your statement is the definition of subjectivity.
share