for those planning to boycott her films:

Truth be told. Liberals plug you ears. You will not want to face this. Without these billionaires ,most of which are Republicans who invest and donate millions to keep the Arts attainable are the same people Democrats love to hate. Their investments are what makes average americans appreciation for the arts possible. So, all you idiots ,stop complaining that they get tax allowances. They do far more than they are credited for.

Yeah rich people will take care of all of the rest of us--Uh huh.
Go back to your job as a lap dog for the rich you schmuck.

the old notion that anyone who's filthy rich is a republican is just a silly myth..

it wasn't the fall from her 16th-floor penthouse that killed her, it was the landing

As long as she keeps starring in cheap mediocre movies where she can steal all the attention, her career will be fine, with or without people boycotting her.




---
Click here:
http://soundcloud.com/tigermaster/

..cheap mediocre movies

yeah.. cause god knows her slew of oscar nominations are for cheap, mediocre films.. 

you trumptards are just plain pathetic.. anyone who disagrees with the orange retard is automatically overrated or mediocre or cheap or ugly or zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz..

at some point you buffoons will have to face the fact that the error lies with the orange idiot you helped vote into office and not with the folks who rightfully criticize his unhinged bigotry..

it wasn't the fall from her 16th-floor penthouse that killed her, it was the landing

I cannot help you if you cannot read.----------I specifically pointed out ,MOST OF-----Without these billionaires ,most of which are Republicans who invest and donate millions to keep the Arts attainable are the same people Democrats love to hate.

Two things.

First, I don't like Trump. I am glad Americans chose him over Hillary only because Hillary's husband turned the place where I live into a war zone when I was 12.

Second, yes, many of her Oscar nominations are for cheap mediocre films. Check her filmography if you don't believe me:
'Into the Woods' - 6/10 IMDb, 6.6/10 Rotten Tomatoes, 69 Metacritic, 50 million budget - a cheap mediocre movie, in other words. I loved that one, though.

'August: Osage County' - 7.2/10 IMDb, 6.4/10 RT, 58 MC, 25 million - another cheap mediocre movie.

'The Iron Lady' - 6.4/10 IMDb, 5.7/10 RT, 54 MC, 13 million - another cheap mediocre movie.
---

Those are her last three Oscar nominated movies. Do you know how many of the movies she was nominated for are in IMDb's top 250? One - 'The Deer Hunter', where she played a supporting role. With so many Oscar nominations and awards, one would expect to see more of her movies to be there.

She rarely stars in risky expensive movies. I think 'Into the Woods' is her most expensive movie made over the last decade or so, and it costs less than 'Deadpool' - and 'Deadpool' was praised for being a great low budget action movie.



---
Click here:
http://soundcloud.com/tigermaster/

Second, yes, many of her Oscar nominations are for cheap mediocre films. Check her filmography if you don't believe me:
'Into the Woods' - 6/10 IMDb, 6.6/10 Rotten Tomatoes, 69 Metacritic, 50 million budget - a cheap mediocre movie, in other words.


'low-budget' or 'cheap to produce' does not automatically equal 'cheap product'.. case in point, some of the best films i have ever seen have been low-budget, indie flicks.. in fact, some of the greatest films of all time were at one time seen as either critical or financial flops..

it wasn't the fall from her 16th-floor penthouse that killed her, it was the landing