At least in the public's mind, it seems like (at least right before his passing) he has been reduced to his post-1983 string of bombs and the trivia that he hated his hugely acclaimed role in Boogie Nights. He was basically a joke in much of the '80s and '90s (on through is stint on Evening Shade) before Boogie Nights reminded everyone how great he was.
Also, you can argue that among his starring vehicles, Smokey and the Bandit is really the only one that has any cultural significance today. Keep in mind that Deliverance and Boogie Nights weren't movies designed with Burt as the main attraction. Even The Longest Yard, may have slipped a bit in cultural recognition due to the Adam Sandler remake, which Burt Reynolds incidentally, co-starred in.
I think it's because younger audiences don't have the passion to seek out older titles anymore (given the over abundance of remakes or homages for them to fall back onto) The fact that media/literature doesn't have the writers, publications (or indeed 'inclination' anymore) is also a factor.
Burt Reynolds is as old to them, as James Cagney was to me when I embraced cinema (but thankfuly, I had a interest/tolerance for older movies) Hopefuly younger movie fans will too? Perhaps 'Boogie Night's (which in itself is around a quarter of a century old) may sate their appetite for older material?
They're in for a real treat if they do (in regards to both actors filmographies)
I doubt most of the older movies will ever be embraced by the masses in the future. The pacing of older films is simply too slow to keep someone interest when they have the attention span of a gnat. MTV and music videos created a super quick pacing that has become engrained in cinema now so that when you have any movie that has slower pacing closer to the way it once was you get box office bombs and films that only show in art house theaters.
They're missing out on a ton of good stuff from people like Burt, Charles Bronson, Oliver Reed, Michael Caine, James Coburn, Gene Hackman, Clint Eastwood, Paul Newman, Sean Connery.
This. Generation x was the last gen that would watch stuff 40 years before their time. Generations after may go back 20 or 25 years. Maybe 30 to watch films like T2 that has a lot of sfx. But they won't watch black and white films or slower paced as you say. It's not wholly their fault. They were all raised on the Internet. When the internet went live in 1996 that was the beginning of the end.
I do not believe so, at least not permanently. Many of his films just happen to sit in that "old enough to look dated - not old enough to be reassessed and generally appreciated" window.
I'm starting to think that every star who made a movie before 1990 is forgotten to a new generation.
Here's some history:
In the early 1960s, movies on television were rather "restricted to being from the long ago past." Warner Brothers only sold its movies "pre-1949" to TV ...mainly on local channels, not network.
So adults AND kids watching movies on TV in the early 60's got a steady diet of stars from decades before -- Bogart, Cagney, Bette Davis...
As the 60's moved on, movies from the EARLY 60's finally started to make it to TV.
Also , there were far fewer channels to watch; far fewer movies shown.
Cut to 2022: Movies are on TV within months...or WEEKS of being in theaters. And some "stream" at the same time as going to theaters (yeah, COVID did it, but it was already starting.) Viewers are FLOODED with movies starring "the stars of today" and pre-1990 movies tend to get tossed away to streaming screens that you have to SEEK out.
As for Burt Reynolds, he was a TV star AT THE SAME TIME he was making Deliverance (he had a cop show called Dan August) and his full-on movie stardom was actually rather short in duration: Deliverance, White Lightning, The Longest Yard. Smokey and the Bandit actually SAVED him after starring in some big bombs -- At Long Last Love and Nickelodeon(both for Peter Bogdanovich, who went from hot to not in a couple of years) and Lucky Lady(with a most un-gorgeous Liza Minnelli trying to play a gorgeous dame.)
Anyway, for those who go looking, they'll find Burt being good and tough in Deliverance, and funny and tough in The Longest Yard, and REALLY funny and not so tough in Smokey and the Bandit. He also did a pretty good Cary Grant as an NFL player in Semi-Tough. He did a "New York dramedy" called Starting Over for the man who would make Terms of Endearment, but its not really a fine film.
PS. In Boogie Nights, he was white haired and a bit frail, but boy did he move and SOUND like the big movie star that he had been. He had a great deep voice. He didn't like that movie - the porn milieu -- but it got him his only Oscar nomination and it may be the only movie that really survives. Cuz it has Mark Wahlberg and Julianne Moore in it.
No, it's just a new time and a new generation. If you are 50 and above you're always going to remember Burt Reynolds. In the 70s and early 80s he was huge - for about a ten year period total. He was up and down (career wise) after that. But he'll be remembered by the age group I mentioned just like the old people when I was young knew about and were aware of Clark Gable. Gable meant to nothing to me when I was young. I would assume youngsters today feel the same way about Burt Reynolds.
Most people have little awareness of movies or movie stars from before they were kids. To those who appreciate movies that are older than they are, Reynolds will not be forgotten.
He was so big at his peak (pretty sure he was world #1 box office star for a few years). He was Clint level, popularity-wise. It always surprises me when I find people who don't realise that.
He managed to maintain starring careers in both movies and tv simultaneously, as well as frequently being a very popular guest on talk shows, which used to appeal to everyone. He made a big impression that I don't think will disappear.