Explain why isn't her topless at 16 considered Child Porn...But?
Girls 16-17 sending topless photo of themselves over the internet is, or even possessing those photos is.
Seems like the law has a major double standard.
Girls 16-17 sending topless photo of themselves over the internet is, or even possessing those photos is.
Seems like the law has a major double standard.
This message has been deleted by an administrator
shareIn my country, porn is porn if its pornographic, i.e. explicitly sexual, not just containing nudity.
---
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zrp-v2tHaDo
Keira Knightley bared her books at age 16 in the movie Holes.
Brooke Shields did full frontal nudity at age 12?! in Pretty Baby.
Yet there is a big drama of Miley Cyrus's crotch shot.
So what the hell?
Keira Knightley bared her books? More like pamphlets.
shareBooks or pamphlets, I'd still be happy to peruse them.
Movies I've seen in 2010: http://www.flixster.com/movie-list/2010-movies-6
funny.
Missing You, A Short Play by F. Zed
Ann: I miss you every day.
Ed: Yeah, your aim sucks.
baby food famine!
The spoiler is A HAPPY ENDING!
You just did something IMDB boards haven't made me do in a while.
Laugh out loud.