MovieChat Forums > Thora Birch Discussion > Explain why isn't her topless at 16 cons...

Explain why isn't her topless at 16 considered Child Porn...But?


Girls 16-17 sending topless photo of themselves over the internet is, or even possessing those photos is.

Seems like the law has a major double standard.

reply

This message has been deleted by an administrator

reply

In my country, porn is porn if its pornographic, i.e. explicitly sexual, not just containing nudity.

---
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zrp-v2tHaDo

reply

Keira Knightley bared her books at age 16 in the movie Holes.

Brooke Shields did full frontal nudity at age 12?! in Pretty Baby.

Yet there is a big drama of Miley Cyrus's crotch shot.

So what the hell?

reply

Keira Knightley bared her books? More like pamphlets.

reply

Books or pamphlets, I'd still be happy to peruse them.

Movies I've seen in 2010: http://www.flixster.com/movie-list/2010-movies-6

reply

funny.


Missing You, A Short Play by F. Zed

Ann: I miss you every day.
Ed: Yeah, your aim sucks.

reply

baby food famine!

The spoiler is A HAPPY ENDING!

reply

You just did something IMDB boards haven't made me do in a while.
Laugh out loud.

reply