It seems like pictures of little Ms Natalie Rupnow, the Madison School shooter aren't being published too widely. However, when other school shooters who were male, their pictures were up everywhere, and rather fast. Damn, I wanted to upload a picture of her, but couldn't seem to find one I could do that with, go figure!
Why are you pining for pictures of a minor?
shareI'm guessing its "persecuted white male syndrome" he thinks another demographic is getting away with something he wouldn't.
Oh yeah sure, try to make me look like the bad guy for pointing out something that's glaringly obvious. That the 15 year old female Madison school shooter who killed two and wounded six is being shielded. At least as far as pictures of her go. The Columbine male shooters had their pictures up faster than the fastest hypersonic missile, and they were minors to I'm sure. Same thing with that punk down in Florida and countless other male school shooters. What a couple of bozos.
shareGoshdarnit, we thought we sneaked one by you. Foiled again :(
feminazis/swamp 0, water-humper 1
It's because.... yet again.... replies don't like facing reality logic fact and truth.
More people accept delusion than ever before these days.
Step up and answer his question then
shareThere only seem to be two photos of her available, neither of particularly good quality. It could just be down to availability.
Articles like this are strange to me though: https://nypost.com/2024/12/18/us-news/female-shooters-like-samantha-rupnow-in-wisconsin-are-extremely-rare-according-to-data/. It's like they're doing pre-emptive damage control on behalf of women. Why?
I also wonder if we'll see a rash of hand-wringing articles asking "How could such a normal person [i.e. a female] do such a thing?" and searching desperately for motives, as they did with Lucy Letby. Male killers are generally assumed to simply be monsters, while the media treat female killers as victims.