MovieChat Forums > General Discussion > is it better to be tough, or better to b...

is it better to be tough, or better to be sensitive?


let's say something happens in life: your dog dies.

one young son is tough, takes it "ok", cries a bit, understands things die, accepts it and moves on to the new dog.

other young son sensitive, loses it, cries a lot, acts out, doesn't want to accept it, seems like needs therapy.

ok, that's kind of lame example, but there is TOUGH and SENSITIVE.
which is it better to be?

[I'm aware there is a myraid of inbewteens, but looking for GENERALITY here, not specific, minor anecdotal instances]

reply

Tough. Obviously.

reply

In this enlightened age??
Isn't it the root cause of:
Toxic masculinity
Bullying
Mansplaining
And feminism?

reply

YOU RUIN EVERYTHING BY BEING YOURSELF.

reply

He totally did ruined it on that one.

reply

THE INBETWEEN IS THE CORRECT ANSWER THOUGH.

reply

Like you and me, of course.

Perfectly balanced.

Plus I’m September born bitches!

reply

To know when to be tough and know how to be sensitive.

A person can be both.

reply

Between the two, it is better to be tough.

reply

Is not.

reply

If you are too sensitive though that can cause problems. Being tough could be an advantage in many situations, as you can deal with things easier and move on from them.

reply

Being “too” anything is never good. Too kind, too poor, too smart…

I see it this way:

If I have one chance to live life on earth I’ll prefer to stay sensitive to everything and everyone around me instead of making a shell of toughness to block out emotions.

Cold people are the worst.

I’m warm and you know it buddy bud!

reply

It depends

reply

Added number points just for clarity

TOUGH
(1) one young son is tough, takes it "ok", cries a bit, understands things die, accepts it and moves on to the new dog.

SENSITIVE
(2) another young son is sensitive, loses it, cries a lot, acts out, doesn't want to accept it, and seems like he needs therapy.”

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I would argue that your first example actually demonstrates being ‘tough without being insensitive’ , which is an ideal personality trait that will help one go far in life.

Often, when some people (not you 123GUY) talk about being TOUGH, what they really mean is ‘acting like an insensitive asshole’ and might suggest something like, “It's just a dog! Get a new one and get over it!” This attitude is unhelpful and damaging.

(1) The person in your first example is tough while also successfully navigating their emotions during the grieving process in a way that allows them to continue fulfilling their societal roles and functions. This type of resilience will get one through many of life's unexpected difficulties, such as the loss of a loved one, while also processing and acknowledging one's emotions in a healthy way.

(2) Your second example describes someone who is such an emotional mess that it causes significant distress and impairment in their life, and, as you astutely suggest, probably needs professional help.

TL;DR The individual in your first (1) example embodies a balance between being tough and sensitive that will go far in life.

*Also, I feel compelled to mention that not everyone shows their emotions by crying, and just because someone might not cry at a funeral or when their dog dies, does not mean they are being cold or insensitive; they may just process their emotions differently. It’s only a problem when the way they process their emotions causes problems in their lives or the lives of others. I only mention this because I never cry at funerals, even though I’m always saddened by the loss.

Good topic BTW

reply

I CRY OVER DEAD DOGS BUT DEAD PEOPLE....I AM WIRED WEIRD.

reply

I cry during movies but for real-life shit, not so much, I'm wired weird too lol.

reply

YEAH...ME TOO...SOMETIMES DESCRIBING A MOVIE OR SHOW THAT GETS ME...GETS ME.🤣

reply

I don't really cry for real-life shit either, but I was listing to a song in the car today, wasn't even a sad one, and I cried.

I think that this question is really loaded, because it really depends how the situation is being internalized. I mean we can be tough in all sorts of situations, and even truly think that we are fine. The brain works in weird ways, and sometimes, something that we thought we packed away a long time ago can become an issue.

As to one is better than the other it really depends on the person and the situation. If the sensitive person can get through the event at the time through their tears, that can be fine. We all process grief differently. Sometimes the "tough" person might not be processing anything at all and be living with unresolved grief which could lead to other issues down the road.

So yeah, I'm kind of parroting what you said, but I like to add my two cents. :)

reply

good answer too!

I'm seeing a lot of non-tough people in real life (not internet news and crap) and wondering how they would benefit if they were toughened up a lot? Seemingly incapable of dealing with normal every day life without "taking everything to therapy". I'm not AGAINST therapy, but has it become routine, replacing normal life experienced defenses?

tween tough and sensative, I feel tough is far more realistic. Humans never relied on therapy living in caves... they killed bison to live another day. Now, someone says any certain word, people are triggered to tears and can't handle their life.
What a mess.

They need to be tough.

To blaance, I know many well adjusted people who are also tough, and properly sensative. Not one of them needs therapy. MOST of my friends don't need therapy. We have each other. :)

reply

[deleted]

This reminds me of that Star Trek episode where the transporter splits Kirk into two people. One has all his tough, aggressive qualities and the other is purely sensitive and thoughtful. Emo Kirk was smart but totally ineffectual.

I think that episode was correct. Both traits are important.

reply

they both are important.

but tough kirk would have easily kicked weak kirk's ass, kiled him and taken over. Easily. :)

reply