MovieChat Forums > General Discussion > candidate withdraws from election due to...

candidate withdraws from election due to past photos


who knew nova scotia politics was so interesting.

here's the photo

https://images.app.goo.gl/SVsLaiNbLJXv92WbA

the story

https://www.ctvnews.ca/canada/n-s-liberal-leader-reaching-out-to-candidate-who-says-she-was-forced-out-over-photos-1.5520942

reply

oh

tattooed.
looks vaguely pissed off.
potentially very very stern.

she's everything i've ever wanted.

reply

she's got your vote. 😊😊

reply

i think politics is mostly bad news and often (always?) kinda pointless and i try to divest myself from it as much as possible.

but yeah. 100% in her corner over here.

reply

Paraphrasing Mitch Hedberg, aren't all photos of something in the past?

reply

you missed the point

reply

It's just a joke about saying a photo is of something past.

Hedberg's original joke was about saying you were younger in a photo, but same idea.

reply

you still missed the point.

reply

No, I was making a llttle joke about how you worded the title of your post. My comment had nothing to do with the point you were making, in any way. It was about your choice of words.

reply

I got it. "Past Photo's" is redundant.

reply

It seems you missed the point.

reply

which is?

reply

Hownos: "past photos"

Haslet: "aren't all photos of something in the past?"

Clear as day.

reply

he can start his own thread if he wants to discuss photos.

reply

Wah??? He didn't want to discuss photos. He commented on your thread title.

reply

you had a sense of humor at one time. leave me alone.

reply

Guy, relax.

His post didn't even pertain to your thread subject, and it wasn't even an attack on you, at all.

Your thread title just reminded him of a funny joke. That's all.

reply

it's it was meant to be a fun thread not some lecture about what a photo is.

reply

His post actually helped make it a fun thread, though. He was making a joke, not lecturing at all.

reply

Dude, you're getting worked up about nothing. The fact that he made a reference to a comedian already shows it was not mean-spirited.🤷‍♀️

reply

i am done with you.

reply

Cool story, bro.👍

reply

Yeah. It's just an old Mitch Hedberg joke I liked. His comment brought it to mind.

reply

It was a funny joke. But, the OPs ultra-serious reaction to multiple posters re: "from the past photos" is even funnier.

One entertaining exception to photos in the past:
Twilight Zone (of course):
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Vz7C7DY4qTE

reply

it is possible to post future photos?

reply

Only if you're in the Twilight Zone. Never venture there.

reply

But time travel is relative, the photo would be from a past future delivered to the present.

reply

I don't believe the characters were able to alter the events in the photos into the past future which is the whole problem. The photos became their future future.

I would've snapped a photo of the OTB section in a newspaper. (I assume there was no lottery in those days.)

reply

I was just playing off the idea that all photos are past photos... the "future photos" were taken in the past of some future.

reply

I thought the future photos were taken in the present which becomes the past to reflect the future which becomes the present.

reply

Hownos!!!! 😱

I’m surprised that you of all people would so flagrantly disregard the forum rules.

Poo litics 💩

reply

this post has nothing to do with politics. does anyone here have a sense of humor?

reply

Ouch 😣

reply

you really think this thread was about right/left issues?

reply

To be honest I just read “candidate” and “election” and just assumed it might be political. My mistake mr grumpy pants.

reply

not everyone here is obsessed with politics 24/7

reply

Right you are

reply

What's funny about it?

reply

that people are hung up on a photo and don't lose your sense of humor.

reply

[deleted]

To be fair, he does have a point.

reply

no he doesn't. he didn't read what the thread was about.

reply

I understand what you’re saying, but if we start allowing posts that allude to Politics (and I completely get that you weren’t), then it’s the thin end of the wedge and before we know it GD will morph into Politics 2.0, which nobody wants.

reply

it's a human interest story. she happens to have been a politician. she could have been a teacher or a doctor. this no politics thing is becoming an obsession with some.

reply

I’m just fearful of the floodgates opening and it becoming a cess pool that drives all the nicer posters away.

reply

they probably should have the ability to tell what is and isn't political.

reply

I’ve often wanted to post threads about people that happen to be politicians, but have always resisted because it would make me appear hypocritical (I really have little faith in politicians - full stop). Unfortunately, no matter how innocent your intentions are, somebody somewhere will pick you up on it.

reply

no one is discussing policy or ideology in this thread. you are looking for something that is not there and was never intended.

reply

Not at all, I completely understood the nature of your post, however, there are many others that can’t differentiate between Politics and a non-political thread that just happens to be about a politician.

reply

this was meant to be a fun thread. you don't seem to get it. if a person can't tell the difference between this thread and an outright political thread then they are probably not worth having around.

reply

Getting back to the photo, I don't find her at all desirable.

reply

is it the tattoos?

reply

It's the overall appearance. She just looks to me as possibly being one of those undercover man-haters.

reply

As I’ve said several times, I completely get it, unfortunately others won’t.

reply

if they are that unaware then i don't care.

reply

Wow, now you’re starting on me Andy! What a weird day. I can certainly differentiate between the two, but once again, I was guilty of only skim reading the title and not bothering to click on the link. Jeez Louise! I wish I’d never said anything!!

reply

Absolutely not singling you out at all, merely expressing my fear that once the politics door gets opened an inch in GD, we’ll be overrun (in fact if you read my initial missive regarding your post it said, “To be fair, he does have a point.” Therefore, I was supporting your stance).

reply

“ no he doesn't. he didn't read what the thread was about.”

Well I think I was pretty honest about that. Hey look, I really don’t want to start a “thing” about this. My first comment to you was intended to raise a smile more than your hackles, hownos. Sorry that it pissed you off but it really wasn’t my intention.

Go for gold, post whatever you want. I’ll maybe stay out of your way if you’re not the kind of guy who can take a bit of good natured ribbing that I thought you were.

Again, my apologies.

reply

i accepted your explanation last night and moved on. i am not the one beating a dead horse.

reply

He’s really letting loose these days, isn’t he?!

reply

I think I’m in love.

reply

"It's not my job to make old white men comfortable,"

She's got my vote.

reply

So are you going to tell us what movie StoneKeeper's #1741 is?

reply

Yes, momentarily.

reply

Because I’m an old white guy she would get my vote. :-)

reply

#oldwhiteguysmatter 😉

reply

Watching the news clip no one had a Nova Scotian accent (to my ears).

reply

She's pretty sexy, although I prefer a little more bust. And by "a little more," I mean a lot.

reply

Having to explain what you really mean here is hardly communicating "it concisely."

reply

Yeah, you're right. Sometimes, instead of being vulgarly blatant and just saying "I prefer huge tits!" I will use an extra ten syllables, or three seconds worth of speech to communicate something a little more tastefully.

You got me, tiger. Kudos!

reply

Yup, I did. Thanks for a classic example of doublespeak in tonight's forum.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3tigVYfHVmQ

reply

Three cheers for you! The internet bows to your glory.

reply

It's a full moon in Aquarius tonight, which is all about authenticity, and it's where you fucked up, lol !

reply

LOL, I have no idea what you're talking about, what my "doublespeak" was to begin with, why you think I have an authenticity problem, or why you apparently believe in Astrology, which is hilarious nonsense for 13 year old girls to think about, but for the record, I am actually an Aquarius!

Does that mean anything? Teach me, Obi-Won!

reply

You conceded that I was right and now you're desperately trying to backpedal. You scoff and try to ridicule my tongue-in-cheek reference to astrology and then proudly declare yourself to be an Aquarius. That's blatant doublespeak! (eye-roll)

reply

Cool, so you have no answers, no reply, no followup to anything you said before, and no stated reason for even starting this in the first place. But the fact that I laughed you off initially by sarcastically "conceding" is what matters.

reply

I've been following up plenty. You continue to obfuscate.

reply

OK. Suck a boner, dummy.

reply

Unsurprising. This is what you desperately respond with, you closeted homophobe?

reply

Interesting question for someone who goes around calling other people “pansies”, wouldn’t you agree?

reply

Just one other person, you. You're still smarting so much from that simple jab, you just had to come crawling out of the woodwork and advise him to do something you're clearly unable to, that is, pay me no mind. Thanks for reinforcing my point, hypocrite.

reply

Hmmm that’s an interesting take but in reality I was just letting a perfectly nice poster who got slammed by you in one of your usual tirades know not to worry about it because you’re just a notoriously disgruntled fuck knuckle who is clearly upset that no one here likes him. But your theory is good too 😘

reply

In reality, I just pointed out an inconsistency on his part and you saw it as an opportunity to express your personal resentment and bitterness. Your allegations, which are outlandish lies, btw, look suspiciously like those of another adversary here. Unable to come up with anything original?

reply

Adversary! Lol, for fucks sake man, what do you think this is, battle of the fucking planets?! I have no idea what or who you’re referring to, but if someone else has mentioned your appalling attitude, well I must say I’m hardly shocked. Maybe it’s not everyone else who has the problem. In any case I’ll let you get back to jumping down people’s throats for no good reason. It seems to be a time consuming job for you. Ciao bella xx

reply

Congrats nitro, you’ve been “db’d”!

It’s a right of passage here to be randomly condescended to by our resident weirdo who hates everyone and will attack you out of the blue for any innocuous comment you make.

This makes you one of us 🤗

reply

"One of us." In other words, he's now part of a sickening clique.

I only go after liars, hypocrites and attention whores. Yeah, you're so innocent, huh? You're just as phony as he is, you pansy.

reply

Sweet, let’s make out!

reply

You should be soliciting Kowalski.

reply

Been there, done that, cupcake.

My hard-on beats only for you now. You’re just so charming and friendly and adorable. What’s not to love??

reply

Which means you failed and you're now soliciting me, loser!

reply

A simple no thanks would suffice you big tease 😙

reply

Okie doke. Well thank you, Sig.

I like this place, and I'd very much like to be "one of us."

reply

I like your posts and for the record I chuckled at your original comment. Pay no mind to db, he seriously does attack people constantly for nothing. He seems like a very unhappy individual. I really don’t know why he continues to post here if everyone angers him so much.

Anyway, thanks for the laugh!

reply

Only a scandal if her armpit wasn't shaved.

reply