Gramatical mistakes that are way too common
Some come to mind:
Could of (Should be could have)
I could care less (It’s couldn’t)
If I was (should be if I were)
Some come to mind:
Could of (Should be could have)
I could care less (It’s couldn’t)
If I was (should be if I were)
Spelling grammaticle
share"Its" is the possessive form of it, "it's" is the contraction for "it is"
They're, There, Their
Using the possessive when you mean to use the plural.
If I be is also acceptable.
shareErrors in grammar have never bothered me. As long as I know what the person is trying to say, it's all sweet.
share> If I was (should be if I were)
Actually, both are correct but in different situations. Use "if I were" for unreal situations, "if I was" for real possibilities.
"I didn't hear the phone ring when you called, but if I was in the shower I wouldn't have heard it."
"I didn't hear the phone, but if I were on the Moon you would have had to contact me via NASA."
In the musical, Fiddler On The Roof, when Tevye sings "If I Were A Rich Man" he's choosing the correct word because he knows it will never happen.
Whether quotation mark goes inside or outside another piece of punctuation
https://grammar.yourdictionary.com/grammar/punctuation/does-punctuation-go-inside-quotation-marks.html
That's how I was taught (inside), but I've seen the period outside the quotation marks. It looks so lonely sitting out there. I think it may be a British practice to put it outside??
shareThat linked article says question marks and exclamation points go inside quotation marks. I was taught they go inside or outside according to whether they're part of the quoted material. For example,
She asked, "what time is it?" -- I am stating that she asked for the correct time.
She said, "I don't remember that"? -- I am asking if she stated that she doesn't remember.
Here are three grammar resources that recommend that practice:
https://www.codot.gov/business/grants/safetygrants/assets/APStyleGuideCheatSheet.pdf
https://blog.apastyle.org/apastyle/2011/08/punctuating-around-quotation-marks.html
https://owl.purdue.edu/owl/general_writing/punctuation/quotation_marks/more_quotation_mark_rules.html
My link gets to that under "When Exclamation Points and Question Marks Go Outside"
However, I prefer your links for clarity.
The "bible" is The Chicago Manual of Style, but that requires a paid subscription to access.
> My link gets to that under "When Exclamation Points and Question Marks Go Outside"
Oh, OK -- I didn't look far enough ahead. Thanks for catching my mistake.
> The "bible" is The Chicago Manual of Style, but that requires a paid subscription to access.
I used to have a subscription but let it lapse. I think I'll renew it.
Your and you're.
Who and whom.
> Who and whom
As I said in another post in this thread, at least in US English there's an element of formality involved that sometimes trumps strictly correct grammar. I once had to explain to a Chinese-born coworker why using "whom" is sometimes not a good idea even when it's correct.
I'm a writer, and when I'm writing dialogue, I very rarely use 'whom' even when it's correct. The only time I feel it's appropriate is when the character I'm writing it for is slightly pompous, or maybe a college professor or something similar.
share