MovieChat Forums > General Discussion > Has technobabble ever actually made a mo...

Has technobabble ever actually made a movie better?


Of course, the problem is that the director usually wants something to happen that doesn't make any logical sense so he throws together some random sciency words to explain it. Yet again, Back to the Future had excellent technobabble as it was more of a comedy than anything. I don't know, it's probably that many movies come up with such random explanations for things that are explainable, and the explanations really just use random words and hope to confuse the viewer.

reply

If it serves the story I don't mind the screwy science stuff (The Terminator, Jurassic Park to name a couple of good ones)

reply

Depends on how it's used. If the technobabble is merely used to swiftly get the main character(s) into the major dramatic conflict/dilemma/whatever, and that major dramatic element is not a function of the technobabble itself, it can work well.

An exception to the above is if the technobabble could also be used to get the MCs out of trouble, and they fail to use it. The original Star Trek series suffered from this. In many of the episodes, the wisest choice would have been for Kirk to whip out his communicator and say, "Scotty, save my ass!" -- then beam out. He couldn't, of course, because that would have ended the drama only a few minutes into the episode, and they had a full hour of TV time to fill. They could get away with that for a few episodes, but over 75+ episodes the results became at time quite cliched.

Back To The Future cleverly avoided this. Marty McFly had a working time machine with a dead battery. And unlike a normal car battery, it was going to take a hell of a lot more than twelve volts to get it working again -- thus the business with the lightning bolt.

If the technobabble is used to get the MCs out of their problem -- no. Absolutely not.

reply