MovieChat Forums > General Discussion > Franchises that changed tone in a sequel...

Franchises that changed tone in a sequel.


Whether is was only for one sequel or the sequel changed the rest of the franchise.

Evil Dead. The first one was a legitimate all-out (admittedly cheesy) horror film. Part 2 turned into a comedy/horror and part 3 was just a comedy.

A Nightmare on Elm Street. I don't remember which part it started, but Freddy turned into a borderline standup comedian. New Nightmare ended up being meta.

The Texas Chainsaw Massacre. The first film was a realistic horror film that almost looked like it was shot documentary style. However, the only massacre in part 2 was what the filmmakers did to the film. It was a terrible campy comedy with over-the-top characters.

Mission: Impossible. The first two films were played as serious action films. But once part 3 hit, they became action comedies.

The Fast and the Furious. Remember when these films were about street racing?

reply

The Jason Bourne franchise. The first one was a mix of romance movie with action thriller (which worked surprisingly well).

The following ones were 100% action thriller.

reply

I always felt like that was was the setup and part 2 and 3 were like one movie divided into two. Maybe it's because Paul Greengrass took over for those.

reply

The Color of Money (1986) had a significantly hipper vibe then the original The Hustler (1961).

reply

Yeah, The Hustler was a drama but they added comedy in the Color of Money. Scorsese added music to it too to make it a little more fresh.

reply

“Alien” was a horror film while “Aliens” was more action blockbuster.

reply

That was the one i was going to mention!
Also Terminator followed same path from 1 to 2

reply

And I was going to mention Terminator!

reply

Good one. Aliens is one of my favourite films and that one didn't even cross my mind.

reply

Batman (1989) and Batman Returns (1992) were good films with a dark atmosphere. The third movie, Batman Forever (1995), started getting a bit campy. The last one, Batman & Robin (1997), came across like they couldn't decide if they wanted to do a serious story or a comedy. That one killed the franchise. (There was supposed to have been a fifth film called Batman Unchained but it was canceled.)

reply

It's almost like Joel Schumacher didn't care how far off his vision was from the original films. As bad as they are, they're pretty entertaining.

reply

That happens a lot when you change directors.

reply

But his was so drastic, it felt like a completely new series.

reply

Thor, Dark World to Ragnarok

Also The Riddick movies. Pitch Black is totally different than Chronicles.

reply

I only saw the first Thor. The sequels look like they added so much CGI to everything.

reply