If someone replies to your post/comment... - General Discussion Discussion

[–] JohnMcCock (136) 5 years ago

Agreed.

reply

[–] Kowalski (76313) 5 years ago

LMAO...I ALSO AGREE.

reply

[–] JohnMcCock (136) 5 years ago

I'm starting to get really tired to take my time to write long and thoughtful answers, only to be ignored. Once you receive an answer to something you wrote, it's your obligation to take your time to answer imo.

reply

[–] chilone (17914) 5 years ago

I'm glad someone with 86 posts here, is making the rules.

reply

[–] April-151-CT (10210) 5 years ago

https://i.giphy.com/media/BwOU6uH7afefu/giphy.gif

reply

[–] manwithoutaplan (227) 5 years ago

good stuff

reply

[–] BuckSwope (3511) 5 years ago

M.C. Cock on the microphone! Yeah I will generally reply unless the conversation is going nowhere.

reply

[–] [deleted] 5 years ago

I try to, sometimes there isn't much to comment on or I have commented and the discussion has just reached a natural conclusion.

This is why a "Thumbs Up" or "Agree" button would be useful. A way to acknowledge someone's post without having to write something which may be kind of pointless.

reply

[–] JohnMcCock (136) 5 years ago

Amen!

reply

[–] chilone (17914) 5 years ago

👍

reply

[–] BuckSwope (3511) 5 years ago

A thumbs up button would be nice. I'd like to be able to embed videos and gifs as well, but that is another subject.

reply

[–] chilone (17914) 5 years ago

That would turn the politics boards into an even bigger sewer.

reply

[–] BuckSwope (3511) 5 years ago

I'm not sure that is possible. I guarantee there are members that post on the politics section that are former "Stormfront" members. The racist views expressed are shocking. Do the MODs just let openly racist views to go unpunished?

reply

[–] chilone (17914) 5 years ago

Yep. They put up with antifa members and other generally hate filled people. No one gets their minds changed, there. It's completely pointless.

reply

[–] BuckSwope (3511) 5 years ago

Antifa members? LOL. The members I am speaking of are more the Stormfront "racial purity" types. It's disgusting.

reply

[–] chilone (17914) 5 years ago

I knew you'd show your true colors.

Cheers.

reply

[–] [deleted] 5 years ago

Antifa and Left wingers are the most racist around.

reply

[–] R_Kane (15828) 5 years ago

“ . . . except politics.”

reply

[–] [deleted] 5 years ago

I'm not the one who brought politics into the discussion though.

reply

[–] R_Kane (15828) 5 years ago

Didn’t say you were. I have to make my post somewhere. You were next in line.

Now everybody shut the fuck up.

reply

[–] Kowalski (76313) 5 years ago

ANOTHER SITE IM ON THAT IS DEAD AS DISCO,TMDB...THEY HAVE THE EMBEDDED VIDEOS...ITS QUITE AWESOME..REALLY BRINGS A LOT TO THE DISCUSSIONS AND LISTS TO LIFE...A SITE LIKE MOVIECHAT WITH THE POPULATION AND FLOW WOULD BE OUTSTANDING WITH THE SAME FEATURE.

reply

[–] BuckSwope (3511) 5 years ago

Yes, indeed. Go talk to the MODs! Get this done!

reply

[–] April-151-CT (10210) 5 years ago

The more bells and whistles a site has, the more bandwidth it uses, and that would cost the webmaster more money. Jim pays for the site out of his own pocket, and from the pennies he gets when someone clicks on an ad. That's why he keeps the site bare bones. He'd get more revenue if he'd regularly post the contribution link and ask people to donate (or have the mods post it regularly). I know it's at the bottom of the page. But promoting it a couple of times a month on various boards would definitely help to bring in more revenue which can then be put back into upgrading the site.

reply

[–] actionkamen (23176) 5 years ago

People that use adblock here have no hearts.

reply

[–] April-151-CT (10210) 5 years ago

Well, even if they didn't use an ad blocker, you'd still have to click on an ad for it to generate revenue. So it's basically the same outcome with or without really. I click on the ads every now and then.

reply

[–] actionkamen (23176) 5 years ago

I click regularly too.

reply

[–] April-151-CT (10210) 5 years ago

Thing is though to not do it too often/repeatedly. If you do, they won't count toward more revenue because the ad program will detect that and recognize it as a type of fraud/spam thing.

reply

[–] actionkamen (23176) 5 years ago

No, I only click for the clickbait that actually baited me.

reply

[–] April-151-CT (10210) 5 years ago

There ya go lol 👍👍

reply

[–] BuckSwope (3511) 5 years ago

I'll start doing the same.

reply

[–] BuckSwope (3511) 5 years ago

W/out AdBlock this site is clear compared to others.

reply

[–] AndyKing1967 (38427) 5 years ago

But don't you want to know 'Why Anna Kendrick Refuses to Do Nude Scenes'?

reply

[–] BuckSwope (3511) 5 years ago

Don't we all?

reply

[–] ducksoup (3933) 5 years ago

Sure, but any article with that title won't tell you.

reply

[–] AndyKing1967 (38427) 5 years ago

Noooooooooo!😱

reply

[–] ducksoup (3933) 5 years ago

I bet she's got a third nipple. Wouldn't it suck if something like that was your fetish, but no one will ever show their third nipple?

reply

[–] AndyKing1967 (38427) 5 years ago

What if she had a third boob, a la Total Recall?

reply

[–] ducksoup (3933) 5 years ago

As long as the nipples add up, who cares?

reply

[–] aliensalmon (5650) 5 years ago

I'll try.

reply

[–] TandyMan (11120) 5 years ago

eh... when I throw up a comment, i've typically already said everything I have to say about the matter and am contributing to the thread as a whole. further comments tend to muddy my point i began with. when i choose not to reply i'm not ignoring the poster. i just feel everything that needs to be said is on the page already. including their feedback. there's also no point in filling up the thread with "agreed"s and "you're out of your mind"s. considering a lot of the threads here were begun on a defunct website and the users aren't even around anymore to engage, it makes me feel especially "screw it" about the whole matter.

reply

[–] chilone (17914) 5 years ago

I'm with you.

reply

[–] Stratego (30581) 5 years ago

Please elaborate.

reply

[–] BuckSwope (3511) 5 years ago

LOL

reply

[–] April-151-CT (10210) 5 years ago

Word!! 👍👍

reply

[–] Eric56 (4580) 5 years ago

"McCock"?

reply

[–] BuckSwope (3511) 5 years ago

That's Mr. McCock to you.

reply

[–] Kowalski (76313) 5 years ago

TOO BAD HE DIDNT GET HIS DOCTORITE...DR. McCOCK HAS A NICE cockRING TO IT.

reply

[–] BuckSwope (3511) 5 years ago

What sort of doctor should he be? OBGYN? Proctologist?

reply

[–] JohnMcCock (136) 5 years ago

"DR.McCOCK"

Jeez, that sounds good. Oo Didn't even think about it. Need to write a script. I don't know the content, but I sure know the protagonist's name now!

reply

[–] actionkamen (23176) 5 years ago

He's John McCock... Yippee ki-yay cockfuckers!

reply

[–] manwithoutaplan (227) 5 years ago

I can't wait until they remake Die Hard and never use that in the movie.

They;ll say Yippee Ki-yay bad guy so it can be PG-13

reply

[–] [deleted] 5 years ago

I try.

reply

[–] Eric56 (4580) 5 years ago

The worst is when you write a long post and then someone replies with just one word, "K".

reply

[–] zephyr_cape (2979) 5 years ago

LOL

reply

[–] AndyKing1967 (38427) 5 years ago

👍

reply

[–] actionkamen (23176) 5 years ago

k

reply

[–] Quasimodo (16388) 5 years ago

Well it's not as simple as that though is it ? This is an anonymous board where we really have no idea who we are talking to. And not everyone here is always motivated by pure motives and good will to all. I have a hardened attitude due to years spent as an active IMDb Boards user and believe me there were a lot of bad faith actors on those boards.

reply

[–] [deleted] 5 years ago

Hence why I tend to block trolls even if they aren't directing their crap towards me.

I don't have patience for it.

reply