Your thoughts on "pride month" - General Discussion Discussion

[–] slimone (7996) 6 years ago

OP, why not? I live in CA and this state is progressive in it's views on a number of things like QBT for instance.

reply

[–] Painekiller (355) 6 years ago

Being a sanctuary state is by definition REGRESSIVE, to say nothing of being utter lunacy as we're invaded by waves of central Americans.

Your governor is a disgrace, SF is smeared with poop and Orange County looks like some kind of 3rd world tent slum.

Screw "progressives" and their despicable ruination of anything nice and normal.

reply

[–] Padeen (6459) 6 years ago

I can't believe California has still has Adverse Possession Laws.

https://www.rentprep.com/legal/squatters-rights-california/

reply

[–] Painekiller (355) 6 years ago

On their way to New Aztlan..."la reconquista" moves forward apace...

reply

[–] slimone (7996) 6 years ago

[deleted]

[–] Painekiller (355) 6 years ago

Have you ever once posted a single thing of the slightest value, even inverse value?

reply

[–] slimone (7996) 6 years ago

Of course! How about you?

reply

[–] Painekiller (355) 6 years ago

I submit you are lying, save for the possibility that your posts might trigger some remnant mirth module in here.

reply

[–] slimone (7996) 6 years ago

Somebody needs to kill your pain.

reply

[–] [deleted] 6 years ago

I agree. If liberal thinking means a Latino/3rd world America and a Muslim Europe, something went horribly wrong.

What will 100 years of liberal thinking do to the west?

reply

[–] [deleted] 6 years ago

What will 100 years of liberal thinking do to the west?

It will make the West like the rest of the world which would mean that women get back to baby making and being in the kitchen, homosexuals better stay on the down low and religious freedoms cease to exist especially that religious freedom the Left love the most - the freedom to not believe in a God at all.

But judging by the recent European elections people are waking up as there has been a huge shift to the Right. We had the same down here with our recent election as well. And of course Americans are also waking up.

reply

[–] Painekiller (355) 6 years ago

Amen!

Too all of that btw, but especially:

religious freedoms cease to exist especially that religious freedom the Left love the most - the freedom to not believe in a God at all.

reply

[–] [deleted] 6 years ago

Thanks. I just find it ironic that the Left are bringing about their own demise.

reply

[–] Painekiller (355) 6 years ago

I do as well, but as a grievance-addicted demographic they have to create new outrages to joust at after dispensing with all the old bogeymen.

Turns out they're genius at monsters from the Id.

reply

[–] [deleted] 6 years ago

Yeah I have noticed that. Equality was achieved quite some time back but they can't admit it otherwise they lose their power. They have made a business out of their version of social justice.

reply

[–] Painekiller (355) 6 years ago

And that business, like any Ponzi scheme, HAS to have fresh blood to save/control...else...well we can see that happening now.

Hondurans and MS-13, their next demographics to "save"...reminds me of the guy who took a large stray house cat in only to find out it was a BOBCAT!

http://digg.com/2019/man-takes-bobcat-in-house

Only difference is, MS-13 doesn't stop at peeing all over your life...

reply

[–] [deleted] 6 years ago

Ms13?

reply

[–] bek (759) 6 years ago

I'm in Kentucky and I'm fine with it.

reply

[–] beavis (3249) 6 years ago

I wish my town had cool progressive lesbians instead of gay men

we can both be gay for trent reznor and the cure though

reply

[–] [deleted] 6 years ago

It's one of those "double think" moments that the Left love so much. On one hand they say they want to be like anyone else and they wanted to be treated "normally" on the other hand they want a parade to celebrate their sexuality. So which one is it?

It's like other movements like "Free the nipple" they want to de-sexualize breasts but at the same time they want the shock aspect of exposing themselves in public. So again, which one is it?

reply

[–] Painekiller (355) 6 years ago

It's both, of course.

When hypocrisy is your byline it will always be the lead paragraph in all your' outings.'

reply

[–] [deleted] 6 years ago

A reminder that Catholics should not support or attend LGBTQ "Pride Month" events held in June. They promote a culture and encourage activities that are contrary to Catholic faith and morals. They are especially harmful for children.
- Bishop Thomas Tobin on Twitter (@ThomasJTobin1) - Bishop of Providence, RI

The fact that views like this exist, especially from among a group as hypocritical as Catholic Church leadership, makes me happy that something like Pride Month exists.

reply

[–] [deleted] 6 years ago

Sex is primarily for procreation so I understand why homosexuality is not encouraged.

reply

[–] [deleted] 6 years ago

Well it's not about encouraging, it's about accepting people for who they are. And as a former altar boy in a school where several students were molested by a priest who had been shipped from parish to parish whenever it was discovered he was molesting students (incidentally a few years after he was pulled from his last school, without explanation to the parishioners, he died of AIDS), I find the catholic church's views on homosexuality and particularly morality very hypocritical. The cover up went all the way to the top.

The priest's name was Joseph Birmingham, google if you want to read some truly disturbing shit including Cardinal Law's intimidation and manipulation to keep shit under wraps.

Happy Pride Month.

reply