90% of the people on this board are complete and deluded losers
Always seeing politics in complete black-in-white instead of trying to be objective, and seeing every discussion as a competition. It's sad.
share81 million votes.
LOL
Why do you keep repeating that? You are an absolute troll, I think.
sharewhy did you delete your post?
shareBecause you were right. I am far-left liberal that thinks Kamala should have won. She's perhaps the best female politician ever to exist in the history of America. And I would totally support framing Trump for crimes that he didn't do at all to take over the Presidency.
share"She's perhaps the best female politician ever to exist in the history of America."
That's the most passive aggressive insult towards the capabilities of the female sex I've heard in some time. I may have to borrow that one.
If you were a "far left liberal" (where I can't imagine what the "far" shall stand for, other than copying a word you like without understanding its meaning), you wouldn't have wanted Kamala to win, you would have (like I do) said Democrats and Republicans are both right wing authoritarians, the differences between them are from a left wing perspective so small that it's not worth wasting time to vote as long as these two are the only options.
Do the test of the politicalcompass,
https://www.politicalcompass.org/test
let's see if you end up at -9.5/-9.5 (where I am) and if not, then reevaluate what your political position is.
The biggest difference between the two parties , by a large margin , is that Braindead infantile ego driven pathological liar Trump is captain of one of them.
That's not really a big difference.
In the end they all do what their donors want them to do and the fact Trump has a ....... let's say ...... unique way of presenting his ideas, doesn't make a difference on which of his ideas are done in which way.
Gonna be interesting though to see what will happen when Musk drops Trump after he got the tax break he wants.
I began taking this survey and couldn't get past page 2. The questions, while sometimes attending to meaningful issues, were worded in such a biased manner and were so devoid of context as to be completely useless. For example, "Is it better to lower inflation or lower unemployment?" That answer depends on the source of the inflation and the source of the unemployment. Are they occurring in tandem? Is the inflation caused by the moneyed elite increasing the money supply in such a way that their holdings retain value by inflating away the value of my more modest savings? Is the unemployment a product of inevitable technological progress (think of the blacksmith during the industrial revolution) or is it because corporations have outsourced jobs to save on labor costs? Only a simpleton could think these questions have any value.
Furthermore, they were all predicated on the Marxist view that humans are interchangeable economic creatures and that all our relationships are blindly transactional. In fact, human ties have evolved to prioritize genetic distance, or lack thereof, in our aspirations and relations. No matter how dispassionately I answer any of these questions in theory, ultimately I want what's best for my people above all else.
Their compass and the questions were fabricated by radical leftoids, which means that almost everything is backwards, inverted or upside down.
shareMaybe he meant ‘far out man’.
The two parties are Right and even further Right.
She's retarded and so are you.
share