MovieChat Forums > Politics > HORRIFIC SUBWAY ATTACK: WOMAN BURNED TO ...

HORRIFIC SUBWAY ATTACK: WOMAN BURNED TO DEATH IN NYC


A man set a sleeping woman on fire inside a Coney Island F train, then calmly watched as she burned to death in a shocking attack.

The horrifying incident occurred Sunday morning at the Coney Island-Stillwell Avenue station, with the suspect captured on video sitting nearby as flames engulfed the victim.

Authorities describe the suspect as 25–30 years old, 5’6”, wearing a gray hoodie, jeans, and a dark knit hat with a red band.

A $10,000 reward is being offered for information leading to his arrest.

https://x.com/MarioNawfal/status/1870928502603890778

reply

Guatemala immigrant apparently. But clearly false news because according to the democrats, immigrants are beneficial to society.

reply

2018. Trump let him into country.

reply

Personally.

reply

How many times will you say this like Dems weren’t absolute saboteurs of Trump’s border efforts in that timeframe

reply

Yup, 100% truth.

reply

Atypical ledtoid response. Claim Trump's wall is waycist and block funding for it. Blame Trump when illegal immigrants commit crime.

reply

On Trump's watch.

reply

Raw leftoid drone mentality on display. It's always Trump's fault despite all evidence to the contrary

reply

A side effect of derangement syndrome.

reply

Trump shouldn't make campaign promises that he clearly breaks.

reply

What nonsense! The Senate, Congress and Supreme Court were majority Republican for Trump's first two years and he did nothing. Neither did Mexico pay for any wall.

I'll guarantee that there won't be any wall when Trump returns with a majority Republican Congress, Senate and Supreme Court once again.

You need to get used to his broken campaign promises from your do nothing president. You've been had and I'm laughing about it.

reply

You live in a progressive bubble where the only history is the one that favors your partisan perceptions. The beloved tactic of leftist immigration interests has never been to use the political branches to persuade Americans to support progressive policy. Instead, the favored progressive tactic is all-consuming lawfare.

In Trump’s first term, the American Civil Liberties Union and the Immigrant Defenders Law Center (both heavily funded by Dem donors) encamped in San Diego federal court and filed for injunction after injunction against Trump’s immigration efforts. One lawsuit challenged Trump’s ability to waive environmental laws to build border fencing. Another lawsuit challenged the Border Patrol’s practice of making civil immigration arrests inside the federal courthouse. Another lawsuit attacked the policy of U.S. officials turning away asylum seekers at border crossings that were deemed to be “at capacity.” Another sought to prevent the Trump administration from implementing a rule requiring asylum seekers to first seek refuge in Mexico or elsewhere.

The 9th U.S. Circuit in California, dominated by liberal progressive jurists, upheld nearly all of these pro-illegal alien rulings designed to manifestly sabotage every immigration effort Trump attempted to implement and embroil his entire first term in time- consuming litigation until the 2020 election.

reply

Excuses, excuses! This joker entered on Trump's watch. Your guy talks a lot and does nothing except gives himself and his billionaire cronies huge tax cuts. He's already trying to back out of his campaign promise to end the Ukrainian war within 24 hours and lower inflation.

Get used to disappointment from your loser cult leader.

reply

It makes sense that you quickly went to a face saving troll post

reply

Everything I wrote is true. Authoritarians use the same playbook. If you haven't noticed, Trump is placing his billionaire cronies in power. That's called an oligarchy. If you think their goals and yours are similar, then you're deluding yourself.

reply

Merry Christmas Keelai. I hope you have a happy healthy 2025. There’s plenty of time for us to argue in the new year. For now, I wish you peace and a happy holiday with your family

reply

This year I'm celebrating Festivus. But, I'll wish you a Merry Christmas and Happy New Year!

No peace today since I get to do the Airing of Grievances to let you know how much you, other MCers and the world have been a huge disappointment to me.

reply

The woman burned by the Guatemalan illegal migrant seems to have been intoxicated. She's in flames and doesn't seem to react, or feel pain.

reply

Phew! For a moment there I was thinking a crime was being committed by a dodgy immigrant.

reply

No, the resolution is poor in this video but in others it's clear he was handing her some Tylenol because she had said something about feeling warm.

reply

Do you have a link?

I read a book written by a woman who accidentally set herself on fire. She said she didn't feel any pain while ignited because the fire destroyed nerves in her skin.

Maybe the woman on the train had no idea what was happening at first or was in shock. I read she was elderly with a walker. Same person wrote that her life could have been saved if onlookers and/or police have stepped in and rolled her on the floor to out the flames instead of watching.

reply

The unfortunate woman burned by the Guatemalan was young and named Amelia Carter.
https://knowinsiders.com/who-was-amelia-carter-woman-burned-alive-nurse-from-orlando-or-phd-in-history-42257.html
Perhaps she wasn’t intoxicated. Her pain receptors destroyed.

reply

"Who Is Amelia Carter? Fake Identity of NYC Subway Fire Victim Goes Viral

A post has gone viral on social media that falsely identifies a victim of a recent attack on the New York City subway.

On December 23, a post claimed the victim was a woman named Amelia Carter, and included an AI-generated image. The post, which is a hoax, had been viewed 2.4 million times on X at the time of publication.

A spokesperson for the DCPI confirmed to Newsweek that identification of a the victim in the attack is still pending.

One site posted an article about Amelia Carter, creating an entire backstory for the fictional woman; claiming that she had worked as an intern on Bernie Sanders' 2016 presidential campaign, and that she was a nurse in Mount Sinai Hospital in New York."
https://www.newsweek.com/nyc-subway-fire-victim-amelia-carter-ai-misinformation-hoax-2005548

reply

She was homeless according to authorities. That makes sense she was sleeping on a train at 7am on a Sunday morning.

Odd for a homeless person to kill another homeless person unless they were acquainted. My Spidey sense believes maybe they had words during panhandling or argued in the past. Why was he riding a train to Coney Island in Brooklyn when his shelter was in Manhattan? Anyway, I hope they find out her identity. Very sad situation.

reply

It's actually more likely that her epidermis had been burned through the layers that contain nerves by that point.

I've had it explained to me by firefighters that when they respond to house fires and residents have suffered burns, they are actually more cautious with those who are not in pain and want to help put out the fire than they are those screaming in agony. It's contrary to common experience, but those who don't feel pain may actually be worse off with more severe injuries when fire is involved.

reply

Crazy facts. So when damaged by fire it's better to be in pain than to be OK.

reply

So when damaged by fire it's better to be in pain than to be OK.


I think what he meant is that you have a better chance of surving severe burn if you are still feeling pain. Becuase if you are not feeling pain, means your skin and organs are super fucked.

reply

New York City is experiencing insane gridlock surface traffic, because people are legitimately afraid to take the subway or walk

reply

The interesting Question is, how people could just stand around and watch this and not stop this asshole?? Apparently, people don't want to get involved and have to go to Court and have their life turned upside down by being a good samaritan

reply

No, because the same behavior has been done many years earlier. Seinfeld did an episode in which they watched a mugging:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zPnK0NCn_MQ

The Good Samaritan Law is supposed to encourage getting involved.

At least three high school students recognized him on a train and phoned police. Better question is why were the police watching her burn to death instead of attempting to immediately out the flames? I was always taught to roll on the floor to snuff out flames. The cop watching should've directed her to do that or removed his jacket, placed her on the ground and snuffed out the flames with his jacket.

Police inaction reminds me of the Texas cops who stood around while school kids were being slaughtered in the school.

Stop, drop, cover and roll:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KPfT2O358pE

reply

I watched a Seinfeld episode once, you're wrong.

reply