MovieChat Forums > Politics > TRANSGENDER ASSHOLES at it again.

TRANSGENDER ASSHOLES at it again.


https://x.com/MrAndyNgo/status/1864287334235058414

The Biden-Harris administration joined the ACLU in a radical lawsuit to argue before the Supreme Court that it is a right to medically transition minors. If they win, it could also fundamentally transform understanding of anti-discrimination laws that protect women and girls across the U.S.

reply

Yuck, but does it really go anywhere with about a month and a half left of the Biden Regime? Plus the Supreme Court would have to agree to take the case which I don't see them doing.

reply

I can't imagine this will be successful. These people are so evil they want to permanently disfigure and sterilize children.

reply

There's no way they will win and the ACLU needs to be razed to the ground.

reply

Why are trans people so hateful and destructive?

reply

That question reveals a spectacular lack of shelf awareness on your behalf.

Why are you?

reply

Can't discuss the facts?

reply

Are you suggesting that you are discussing facts by making a sweeping statement that all trans people are hateful? That hasn’t been my experience from the trans people I’ve met. Your opinions on various matters however has displayed a vigorous hateful attitude towards several groups of people, not just transgender folk.

Do you know any trans people yourself?

reply

I'm talking about the OP you retard. Either discuss it or leave. You always enter my threads trying to change the subject. Discuss the facts or leave.

reply

Ooh getting under your skin now, clearly. What you’re actually saying there is AGREE WITH ME OR LEAVE but unfortunately for you that’s not how a forum works.

I haven’t changed the subject at all, you just asked why trans people are so hateful yet the person displaying a hateful attitude is yourself. I have every right to point that out and you have none to order me out of your thread when it doesn’t go down the way you want.

So here we are.

reply

So now you're going to throw a tantrum. Why do you think your side is cutting off genitals of children?

reply

Who is my side? You don’t know me or who I support politically. You are assuming because I think you’re a small minded bigot that I’m part of a woke movement which is false.

I’m perfectly calm. No tantrums here at all.

Did you even notice that my first comment here was voicing the opinion that I personally DISAGREE with allowing sex change procedures to be performed on children?

reply

Why do you think the left is cutting off the genitals of children?

reply

See that’s the type of emotionally charged rhetoric that may impress someone with less intelligence, but it doesn’t work on me, so you can save it.

I know not everyone on the left is performing sex reassignment surgeries on children as per your suggestion, or even advocating for it. Just as many on the left oppose trans athletes competing in women’s sports.

Your simplistic generalisations are hollow and solve nothing.

reply

I never said everyone. Why do you think the left is cutting off the genitals of children?

reply

“The left” suggests everyone who isn’t on the right. I don’t know why this particular proposal has been floated but to me, personally, it’s not something I agree with. You’re asking me to speak towards something I have no involvement in, surely even someone of your limited comprehension skills can understand that’s an impossible question for me to answer.

My question regarding whether you know any trans people yourself is rather more straightforward though, and yet you refused to provide an answer. I wonder why. Possibly because it would illuminate the fact that your rhetoric is coming from an entirely uneducated place with no lived experience to support your obvious agenda.

Go ahead though, ask the question again and make sure you put the words left, children and cutting genitals off in succession for maximum horrific effect.

reply

My agenda is denouncing people who are cutting the genitals off children.

reply

What about young girls who wish to transition to boys, are you forgetting about them in your crusade?

Why are you even on MovieChat? You never talk about movies at all. You just post inflammatory political shit, bigoted stuff trying to incite discrimination against minorities and the like.

Do you even watch movies?

reply

Posting about people transing kids is not bigoted you retard. I'm amazed how stupid you are.

reply

Now now Joan Collins, no need to be so bitchy 😂

You are denying you’re bigoted? Even with your singularly minded posting history as evidence for all to see? Come on. If anything is retarded, it’s that claim.

So, what’s your favourite movie?

reply

Denouncing people transing kids is not bigoted. That's a fact.

reply

Oh yes, you’re a regular Mother Theresa.

So what’s your favourite movie?

reply

"Now now Joan Collins...."

Couldnt think of a referrence more dated than this? lol. You must be my parents age.

Was Joan Collins "bitchy"?

reply

I was going to say Joan Crawford but I thought I’d keep it contemporary for you kids. Have I missed the mark? Oh well.

I’m only 105. I think I might know your parents. Reginald and Gladys Bananas from Frogmore House, am I right? Fine people.

reply

Jim might be a Boomer.

reply

X and proud, Mr Televison.

reply

They hate children because they can't create them.

reply

In what way are trans people "hateful"?

Hateful of others? Hateful of themselves?

reply

They’ve been told repeatedly by the left that they don’t have to be accountable for their actions and that it’s OK for them to treat people without one ounce of the respect that they are somehow by default entitled to.

reply

What are they classing as minors though? I definitely think it’s a slippery slope to advocate for transitioning children before they are emotionally mature enough to make that huge decision, even with consent of the parents.

reply

You didnt even look at the link.

reply

Correct.

I’ve never looked at x or Twitter and I’m not about to start for you.

reply

Good thing you responded when you dont even know whats happening. They are operating on children all over the country. Half the states had to pass bans to stop them from cutting childrens genitals off.

reply

Well you could have just answered my question. I think it’s a complicated issue and I will admit I don’t have the scientific knowledge to understand why a person suffers from gender dysphoria or why they feel compelled to transition. It’s a condition I’m grateful I don’t suffer myself because I could imagine it would be an emotionally and mentally crippling experience. Especially when people are so cruel towards people who do as evidenced daily here on this forum.

I have known trans people who seem quite intelligent and kind though. Good people who don’t seem to have any intention to harm others.

As I said originally though I think performing irreversible surgical procedures on children seems like a dangerous practice to advocate for. Again though, I don’t have the knowledge or understanding to pretend that my opinion is the last word on the matter.

reply

So what, are you waiting for some "study" to come out that is suddenly and magically going to make irreversible surgical procedures on children make sense? Do you really have that much inherent brainrot or are you just a spineless, habitual fence-sitter?

reply

Hello Vader. Nice to meet you too.

I’m just saying I’m not an expert. Which appears to be a good thing, this post has too many of them already.

Who would have thought me saying I’m against children transitioning would generate such ire? Just another day in Politics 😁

reply

See, this is a problem - the agenda of trying to gatekeep common sense behind some contrived concept of "expertise" in a particular area.

I don't need to be an expert in human anatomy to know that when I prick a finger, it bleeds. And I don't need to be an expert in "gender dysphoria" to know that a child can't logically or ethically consent to having perfectly healthy parts of their body chopped off and mutilated, or taking puberty blockers that will permanently affect their physiology.

But anyway, I'm glad you agree.

reply

Groomers gonna groom.

reply

Ick. Every time I hear someone dismiss lgbt people as groomers, knowing that I’ve never in my 40+ years met a gay or trans person guilty of such a disgusting crime, I always wonder if it’s just deflection.

Every

Single

Time

🤔

reply

Did you seriously expect them to admit it to you? Just how naive are you for someone at your age?

reply

Not at all.

I’m not stupid.

Just expressing how that blanket accusation makes me feel.

reply

Why is it that when I read about a Catholic priest who's been caught touching kids, nine times out of ten the victim was a boy?

reply

Probably because 80% of adult males who molest boys don’t identify as gay, most are married and have children of their own.

I’d be more inclined to ask why, when the ratio of molestation agsinst girls and boys is estimated at 11:1, do people always insinuate homosexual men are the perpetrators when talking about grooming. While everyone is ignoring that the REAL groomers are not sitting behind the teacher’s desk but lurking behind keyboards and fake profiles on social media.

reply

80% of adult males who molest boys don’t identify as gay

If they’re diddling their own gender then obviously they’re gay, who the hell cares what they ‘identify as’ 🤦🏻‍♂️

reply

I care, especially when the insinuation is that openly homosexual men can’t be trusted around children. It’s deflection and a really shitty way to perpetuate an anti-gay agenda.

You do understand that the vast majority of child abuse victims are girls, don’t you? Gonna pin that one on the fags too?

reply

Your whataboutism doesn’t change the fact that drooling Catholic priests always select boys to diddle.

Stop defending them. We’ve been over this.

And cool it with the homophobic language.

reply

Hey Mel T (schizzo spice) don’t try your two dollar reverse psychology tactics on me, they might work on some of your less intellectually sturdy opponents but I can see through it like looking through a freshly cleaned window.

Yeah I have long been a critic of the Catholic Church and its eternal covering up of abuse by priests, if you’d ever bothered to ask. Where’s my defence? Show me clever man. I’ll wait.

I’ve earned the right to use the term fag and reclaim it from knuckle draggers such as your fine self. Takes some of the intended sting out when it’s fired my way. Problem with that? Take it up with someone who will listen.

reply

Only person using the term ‘fag’ here is you. Not the first time you’ve spewed homophobic slurs on these boards.

Your whataboutism still doesn’t change the fact that drooling Catholic priests always select boys to diddle.

reply

You’re a fucking idiot.

Let’s just ignore each other aye. Life’s too short for your shit.

reply

There it is - the rage dumping of someone who’s wrong and can’t admit it.

You’re welcome to ‘ignore’ me, I’ll keep pointing out where you’re wrong. The things you run away from are far more interesting and revealing than the drivel you write.

Your whataboutism still doesn’t change the fact that drooling Catholic priests always select boys to diddle.

reply

80%+ of the molestations by priests are boys. Gay priests are a huge problem in the Church.

reply

Someone will see my post above and try to convince me that the priests doing all the molesting are actually heterosexual pedophiles and not homosexual pedophiles. 😂

reply

Exactly what SheweeJim attempted above, and failed 👆🏻

reply

little jimmy is a failure at everything he does.

reply

He really is.

When he lost he ran away and claimed he put me on ‘ignore’. Incredible that such people still expect to be treated as credible voices 🤣🤷🏻‍♂️

reply

try to convince me that the priests doing all the molesting are actually heterosexual pedophiles and not homosexual pedophiles.


Oh dear. We have been here before and there's little chance that you are open to persuasion. But for anyone else: the LGBTQ grooming conspiracy theory is a far-right conspiracy theory and anti-LGBTQ trope alleging that LGBTQ people, and those supportive of LGBTQ rights, are engaging in child grooming and enabling child sexual abuse. Although the belief that LGBTQ individuals are more likely to molest children has no basis in fact, this stereotype has existed for decades in the United States and Europe, going back to before World War II.


https://www.nbcnews.com/nbc-out/out-politics-and-policy/groomer-pedophile-old-tropes-find-new-life-anti-lgbtq-movement-rcna23931

reply

Thats a nice story what does it have to do with priests?

reply

The context is homosexual paedophile grooming etc. Please pay attention.

reply

Explain it to me like Im 5. You get one chance.

reply

I did, just above. The Grooming Conspiracy theory is just as applicable to priests as to any other part of the homosexual community. There is no denying that a good number of homosexuals are in the RC Church (or the churches generally, come to that) but correlation is not cause. The belief that LGBTQ individuals are more likely to molest children has no basis in fact.



Facts About Homosexuality and Child Molestation

Groth and Birnbaum (1978) studied 175 adult males who were convicted in Massachusetts of sexual assault against a child. None of the men had an exclusively homosexual adult sexual orientation. 83 (47%) were classified as "fixated;" 70 others (40%) were classified as regressed adult heterosexuals; the remaining 22 (13%) were classified as regressed adult bisexuals... Other researchers have taken different approaches, but have similarly failed to find a connection between homosexuality and child molestation. .. Reflecting the results of these and other studies, as well as clinical experience, the mainstream view among researchers and professionals who work in the area of child sexual abuse is that homosexual and bisexual men do not pose any special threat to children.

https://lgbpsychology.org/html/facts_molestation.html

Sorry; that was more aimed at a proper grown up person, but I hope you managed to understand anyway. No more from me here; it has all been said before and yet you still lazily wheel out the same tired and disreputable anti-gay stereotypes. It is good enough for some of the bigots on this board, but in the real world it is demonstrably false.

reply

I have never said homosexuals are more likely to molest children. So stop with the straw arguments. Run along now I'm not interested in another dumbass exchange with you.

reply


I have never said homosexuals are more likely to molest children.


"try to convince me that the priests doing all the molesting are actually heterosexual pedophiles and not homosexual pedophiles.." i.e. you think that those doing all the molesting are homosexual pedophiles.

reply

Because there's a high number of gays who infiltrated the Church back in the day. That's why today they aren't allowed to be priests. If there is the slightest hint they might be gay they aren't allowed in...that is straight from Pope Francis.

reply

Have you seen the film? No Escape (1994) ... Same island for the trannies.

reply

I don't think we need to go that far. Though I like your idea, I think mental asylums will suffice.

reply

Actually, not far enough, Mars would be far enough, but unfortunately it’s not habitable … yet.

No mental asylums, they would take over the staff and doctors.

reply

[–] curiousMInd101 (3609) 8 days ago
I don't think we need to go that far.


A+

reply

I'm going to be 59 in 8 months and I was a child of the 70's and 80's and we never ever heard this kind of talk growing up, never had a desire to change our sex for Christ sake!! WTF is wrong with today's youth?? Perhaps Obama should've clarified his speech back in 2012 better when he said you can be anything you want to be and no one can stop you or something to that affect and what he should've said was, you can be a Doctor, a Lawyer, a Race car driver, even President of the U.S, not self mutilating because you can't distinguish whether sporting a Dick & Testicles makes you a male or not. 🙄

reply

Seems like it should be very easy to say “no gender changing medical procedures on children” without qualification and loopholes. We sure had no problem banning children from smoking cigarettes and getting tattooed.

reply

The movement for transgender rights in the United States has been ongoing since the 1960s, but some key events include:
1959
Christine Jorgensen, a trans woman, was denied a marriage license in New York
1976
The Superior Court of New Jersey ruled in M.T. v. J.T. that trans people could marry based on their gender identity
1980
The ACLU of Southern California established the Transsexual Rights Committee
1999
Trans activist Monica Helms designed the transgender pride flag
2015
The Supreme Court ruled in Obergefell v. Hodges that people have the right to marry regardless of sex
2020
The Supreme Court ruled in R.G. & G.R. Harris Funeral Homes Inc. v. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission that title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 protects transgender people from employment discrimination
Other events that have impacted transgender rights include:
The ratification of the Fourteenth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution in 1868
The ACLU's work in the late 1960s to persuade the California Supreme Court to strike down an ordinance that barred performers from "impersonating" a person of the opposite sex
The Obama Administration's removal of a ban on transgender members of the military serving openly in 2015
The legal and regulatory history of transgender people in the United States covers many areas, including:
Changing names or sex on legal documents
Protection against discrimination in employment, civil rights, and equal protection
Medicare and Social Security benefits
Transition-related healthcare rights in the workplace
Marital rights
Military service conditions
Medical malpractice
Restroom access
Housing discrimination

reply

Interesting timeline. Shield yourself though bro, a benign presentation of facts is quite likely to get you tarred and feathered ‘round these parts, y’hear?!

reply

I’m a pilgrim from FILMBOARDS, I do the tarring and featherin!

reply

That’s the spirit! ✊

reply

But if everything you listed is true, how come we never heard about this or these cases?? Why?? Why is it taken over 50 years to bring this abnormal bullshit out?? Why??

reply

How come YOU never heard of it, surely you mean. Why speak for all others?

I grew up in Australia (or redneck wonderland, if you will) and even I was aware. One of the most famous media figures/celebrities was a trans woman by the name of Carlotta. Started off as the star of a very famous drag revue called Lés Girls in the 1960s, and I think may have been one of the earliest successful sex reassignment patients in the world. Definitely the first to star in a prime time TV show (called Number 96). Anyway, yeah, it was definitely a thing for a long time and most people hid it because, you know, society and shit. 🤷‍♂️

reply

It's abnormal and Trump puts an end to this in 35 days and Thank God 👏

reply

"It's abnormal and Trump puts an end to this in 35 days and Thank God 👏"

Well said.

reply

What does any of that have to do with the OP?

reply

https://x.com/libsoftiktok/status/1865108375148589081

This is Johanna Olson-Kennedy of the Children’s Hospital of Los Angeles
@ChildrensLA
.

She specializes in chemically castrating and m*tilating children. She’s now being sued by a former patient.

After just 1 visit, 12-year-old Clementine was approved for puberty blockers. She was then put on cross-s*x hormones at age 13, and got a double mastectomy at 14.

It’s time to hold all these “doctors” accountable!!! Trump is going to take all these evil crazy bitches down.

reply

The parents should also be held accountable.

The politicians that supported and approved it should also be held accountable.

The schools that indoctrinated them should also be held accountable.

The insurance companies and other organizations that supported/approved it should also be held accountable.

reply

Allowing a minor to castrate themselves is literally child abuse. WTF is wrong with the left?

reply