Hillarious, let's arrest some right-wing online haters just for the lulz!!
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-13735753/It-duty-save-Hero-security-guard-tackled-Leicester-Square-knifeman-ground-says-members-public-pinned-police-arrived.html
knowing the british media, the story will have pretty much vanished from their websites by tonight.
leftists have blood on their hands here. they're allowing these things to happen.
Really? So why didn't the Southport murders vanish from all websites then?
sharethe muslim lobby didn't care that much about a random black guy with a blurred religions or non religion background.
shareWho is this "Muslim lobby"? You know we've had various incidents over the years where Arabic origin people (thus presumably considered muslim) committed serious crimes and they did not vanish from the internet after 24 hours? Why is this?
shareThe guard, who gave his name as Abdullah, 29, and works at TWG Tea shop in the square, said: 'I heard a scream, at that moment I saw there was one person, roughly [in their] mid-30s or early 30s, and he was like stabbing a kid.
Looks like a man who may be a Muslim intervened in this case.
even better. reasons enough for the Princess of Wales to visit the next mosque!
shareSo what? Should native Brits be thankful that some of the atrocities committed by immigrants are interrupted by other immigrants? That's a frankly bizarre proposition.
shareNo mention of the attacker's age this time, so no excuse to hide their identity.
sharehttps://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/ckg5xx0gly8o
Looks like its a white guy
That's why they show his face immediately. If brown or black, showing his face is not on NWO's politically correct agenda. It took many days for the media to show ONE picture of the killer of 3 white girls. And no he wasn’t a suspect, because he also injured 10 more Britons, witnesses left in horror and blood.
shareWhat the hell are you on about?
The reason the identity of the Southport stabber wasn't revealed was because they were under 18. That's UK law.
Notice also how the media’s image of the child-stabbing Rwandan was of him as a child, instantly trying to draw sympathy for the piece of shit.
This white guy will be tarred, feathered and demonised. More so if he’s ethnically British, less so if he’s some Eastern European immigrant.
That is assuming, of course, that this isn’t a staged event. The media is gagging for an evil white man and Islamic saviour narrative right now.
Update: looking at the images on Twitter the perpetrator looks like some scummy Albanian. If the media continue to be hesitant it’s because this is yet another stabby immigrant who shouldn’t be in the UK.
>Notice also how the media’s image of the child-stabbing Rwandan was of him as a child, instantly trying to draw sympathy for the piece of shit.
This just isn't true. There are multiple court sketches of him looking pretty unsympathetic, and descriptions of his behaviour that aren't presented sympathetically. The BBC has also removed his appearances on their platform from multiple years ago. There's zero attempt to make this killer sympathetic.
>This white guy will be tarred, feathered and demonised. More so if he’s ethnically British, less so if he’s some Eastern European immigrant.
There's nothing said about him at all. His identity hasn't been officially revealed. It's literally just a photograph of him being arrested taken by a member of the public.
>That is assuming, of course, that this isn’t a staged event. The media is gagging for an evil white man and Islamic saviour narrative right now.
Source: "I made it up"
>Update: looking at the images on Twitter the perpetrator looks like some scummy Albanian. If the media continue to be hesitant it’s because this is yet another stabby immigrant who shouldn’t be in the UK.
There's zero way we can know the specific nationality of this man from those pictures and video.
More bullshit gaslighting from Skavau - the regime’s chief cocksucker and child-stabber apologist.
shareGaslighting you'll be unable to specify, and no doubt your response to this will just be to childishly edit your post.
shareThere’s nothing to specify - your gaslighting post speaks for itself 🤷🏻♂️
It’s common knowledge that you’re an evil sack of shit, but making excuses for mass immigration and its resultant horrors, including the ongoing stabbing of children, is a new low, ya sick fuck.
Now fart out an automated smattering of lies and Hatchling questions in a desperate effort to claw back some dignity. Go…
>There’s nothing to specify - your gaslighting post speaks for itself 🤷🏻♂️
It does no such thing. Your empty speculation about what has happened, I would submit, is much closer to gaslighting than anything I'm doing and have ever done.
>It’s common knowledge that you’re an evil sack of shit, but making excuses for mass immigration and its resultant horrors, including the ongoing stabbing of children, is a new low, ya sick fuck.
When did I do anything like that? I simply responded to your completely bogus claim that the Southport killer is being portrayed sympathetically, and responding to your claims regarding any potential narrative about the London stabber.
>Now fart out an automated smattering of lies and Hatchling questions in a desperate effort to claw back some dignity. Go…
There's the childish edit I've come to expect from you. Actual Scientology tier tactics.
Where did I defend any child-stabber on here ever?
shareHatchling and Straw question in one
shareYou literally just accused me of being a child-stabber apologist. By labeling it a straw-question, are you now claiming you didn't do this? At no point have I ever, anywhere suggested any support whatsoever for anyone attacking children. This is just a complete and total lie by you.
shareA mixture of strawmanning and Straw questions
So you're just going to copy and paste yourself now?
EDIT: Your use of "straw question" doesn't even make sense at this point. They're just words without meaning. You need some new logical fallacy terms to butcher.
EDIT: Oh because you never edit anything, eh?
Straw question
Followed by squealing bitch edits
The Southport victims were identified almost immediately. The suspect hid behind the '18 years old' identity law. So far neither the victims nor the attacker have been identifies because.... reasons.
shareYep, the reason the media didn’t immediately splash this ‘white’ man all over the papers was because he’s not white British, turns out he’s a filthy Romanian immigrant ‘of no fixed address’, so most likely another illegal Channel crosser.
Labour will continue to flood the UK with the world’s violent scum to ensure more child murders and rapes, and Skavau will continue to make excuses for this horror show.
The identity of this person was officially revealed in 24 hours. The identity of the Southport killer took multiple days. So your math-logic doesn't make sense here.
And yes, turns it was a Romanian.
We have no idea on how long he got here, or his history.
>Labour will continue to flood the UK with the world’s violent scum to ensure more child murders and rapes, and Skavau will continue to make excuses for this horror show.
That's not official Labour policy at all regarding the boat situation.
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/world-news/2024/08/12/starmer-meloni-europol-people-smugglers-illegal-migration/
---
No doubt this factoid from me will be accused of being "gaslighting" or "straw-questioning" in some way.
Gaslight fail. Southport killer was a minor and that accounted for any delay. You know this, ya lying sack of shit.
Labour's stated policy is as worthless as the Tories’ stated policy to reduce immigration - pure lies to calm the public while they rape and kill them with continued and increased mass immigration. You know this, you lying sack of shit.
I know that was why the Southport killers identity was delayed. When did I say it wasn't?
Also your take on Labours position regarding migrants is wrong. He's collaborating with the Italian PM, a known anti-immigrant conservative:
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/world-news/2024/08/12/starmer-meloni-europol-people-smugglers-illegal-migration/
>Labour's stated policy is as worthless as the Tories’ stated policy to reduce immigration - pure lies to calm the public while they rape and kill them with continued and increased mass immigration. You know this, you lying sack of shit.
How would you even pretend to claim to know this?
I know that was why the Southport killers identity was delayed. When did I say it wasn't?
Also your take on Labours position regarding migrants is wrong. He's collaborating with the Italian PM, a known anti-immigrant conservative:
>WTF are you talking about? The point is that the media didn’t immediately splash this ‘white’ man all over the papers was because he’s not white British, he’s a filthy illegal Romanian immigrant ‘of no fixed address’ which is why they’re not going hell-for leather keeping him on the front page.
It also wasn't a massive story in the same way the Southport killer was. It's also on the frontpage of the BBC now, so I have no idea what the fuck you're babbling on about: https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c5y3e6dl6wgo
>All bullshit. Their promises are as worthless as the Tories’. They’ll maintain and likely increase mass immigration, and you know it, ya lying sack of shit.
Why is that bullshit? You have no fucking idea what they will do. Labour has been out of office for 14 years.
It also wasn't a massive story in the same way the Southport killer was. It's also on the frontpage of the BBC now, so I have no idea what the fuck you're babbling on about: https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c5y3e6dl6wgo
Why is that bullshit? You have no fucking idea what they will do. Labour has been out of office for 14 years.
>Irrelevant diversionary bullshit that in no way refutes my point. Another of your evil dishonest dipshit tactics.
What is diversionary about it? You claimed it is not being covered. It literally is.
>Hatchling question. Starmer is a regime bitch, like you, and therefore wants mass immigration.
Based on what? He's never been PM. Is Italian PM Meloni a "regime bitch" too?
>Plus Labour benefit from hoards of poor immigrants who will vote for them in the hope of receiving more ‘free’ money/housing/healthcare from enslaved taxpayers.
Tell me you don't know how the last election results went without telling me.
Labour lost a lot of voters in that quadrant.
What is diversionary about it? You claimed it is not being covered. It literally is.
Based on what? He's never been PM. Is Italian PM Meloni a "regime bitch" too?
Tell me you don't know how the last election results went without telling me.
Labour lost a lot of voters in that quadrant.
>Hatchling question. Strawman. I never claimed it wasn’t being covered you lying sack of shit.
So when the story broke it was frontpage news. The man being charged, with his identity, was frontpage news. What's the problem?
>The point is that the media didn’t immediately splash this ‘white’ man all over the papers was because he’s not white British
They don't do that either when a white British person commits a crime either.
>he’s a filthy illegal Romanian immigrant ‘of no fixed address’ which is why they’re not going hell-for leather keeping him on the front page.
How long is it you think a story like this ought to remain on the frontpage? What's the normal time you would expect it?
>Hatchling question followed by Straw question. Starmer is Blair’s bitch and Blair is a key player in the regime. Plus it’s obvious from all of Starmer’s actions that he’s 100% regime - he couldn’t even define a woman.
How on earth is Starmer Blairs bitch? Tony Blair has actually specifically urged Starmer to deal with immigration: https://www.theguardian.com/politics/article/2024/jul/09/tony-blair-keir-starmer-labour-immigration-far-right
Tony Blair is retired. He is not a "key player" in anything.
What actions of Starmer, so far, demonstrate that he is "100% regime"?
>Bullshit gaslighting. Labour’s existence depends on bribing those who want a free ride with taxpayer money in exchange for their vote.
https://yougov.co.uk/politics/articles/49978-how-britain-voted-in-the-2024-general-election
Why don't you look at some actual voting breakdown data?
>Morons like you who love to virtue signal while enabling mass child rape and murder are a bonus for them.
I never at any point excused murder or rape. Another outright lie by you.
---
>Now write another tedious screed full of your usual Straw and Hatchling questions mixed with lies, falling flat on your face and failing to convince anybody, succeeding only in showcasing what a dishonest cunt you are. Go…
Back to your childish scientology-tier tactics.