https://store.dailywire.com/products/sweet-baby-plushie
Imagine the outrage if company like Target put out a plushie of a fully grown adult person who happens to be, say, a drag queen, in baby form wearing a diaper
Grasp at more straws. Does the baby have a removable diaper with an open hole in the rear big enough for an adult human penis? No, it doesn't.
Get over yourself.
________________________
Great minds discuss ideas.
Average minds discuss events.
Small minds discuss people.
Leftists always lie.
Wokeness is Weakness.
I think it's funny knowing how many people are triggered by him.
shareYou got your drawers in a wad over a stuffed doll?
shareI didn't, but it's pretty creepy.
shareIt's weird but you don't have to buy one.
But you think it's okay for trannies and gay dudes to talk to kids about anal sex???
>But you think it's okay for trannies and gay dudes to talk to kids about anal sex???
Not to kids, no. I think it's also rich for someone who claims to be such a moral voice to allow a "sweet baby" imitation of himself wearing a nappy.
How is that immoral???
shareIt's not "immoral" per se, it's just creepy merchandise from a guy who speaks so solidly against that kind of LGBT related merchandise. Don't tell me he'd fucking not complain if it was a trans plushie.
shareWow, you are trying REALLY hard to connect the dots here. Just stop.
shareI'll do what I like, without your permission. Matt Walsh is a hypocrite.
shareNo, you're just a moron, desperate to prove a failed point.
shareI remain unconvinced that Matt Walsh would not lose his shit at a doll like this, but trans, being sold.
shareOf course, dumbass. How is that related? Matt is not a fucking tranny.
The question is, why do you think it's okay to market tranny bullshit to children?
He's a hypocrite. Why is a plush baby with a nappy of Matt Walsh okay, but not a hypothetical drag plushie in nappies?
>The question is, why do you think it's okay to market tranny bullshit to children?
I don't, necessarily. It depends on what you it is (how sexualised), and the specific ages in question.
Because Matt isn't sexualizing children, genius. Actually, he helped shine a light on this issue which got the laws passed that protect children from this sort of degenerate behavior, which is also my home state.
shareIs a drag plushie that exists inherently sexualising children anymore than a Matt Walsh "sweet baby" plushie?
sharePlease explain to me how a Matt Walsh stuffed toy has anything to do with sex???
shareIn baby form with a nappy. Drag doesn't also have anything inherently to do with sex.
https://shec.ashp.cuny.edu/exhibits/show/lgbtq-military-history/item/2782#:~:text=During%20World%20War%20II%2C%20soldiers,atmosphere%20of%20conflict%20and%20stress.
It's a fucking toy with no innuendo.
Any discussion of "drag" or the very concept of being "trans" is sexualizing children. It's is exactly what pedophiles to do groom children. Go watch the documentary on Subway Jared. Listen to the recordings of him telling someone how to "groom" children into it. It's exactly the sort of thing we're fighting against but you dumbasses, so eager to show how "inclusive" you are, are completely blind to it. As I've always said, the concept of unintended consequences is completely foreign to you intellectually stunted idiots.
>It's a fucking toy with no innuendo.
Not all drag necessarily has direct innuendo (although kids cartoons have always had innuendo in them since they began, which is ironic)
>Any discussion of "drag" or the very concept of being "trans" is sexualizing children.
Fundamentally disagree. Unless you think pantomime dames have been sexualising children in the UK for 100 years
You are a very unintelligent individual.
share