Shut up clown
Is the media not going to acknowledge that Biden told the President of the United States to shut up and a clown? Haven't heard anything about it on the news. Surprised doogie hasn't made a gleeful post about it yet.
shareHere's my take.
Biden obviously "won" the debate.
He should have apologized the next day and committed to not doing any more debates.
Instead, suggest a forum.
Biden was on the ropes after Trump said "elections have consequences". He continuously mixed up his "facts" and was looking at his cheat sheet the entire time. Its not his fault, he is almost 78 and past his prime.
shareWhat did Biden tell Trump to shut up to? For pushing him to answer if he was going to pack the courts or not. That was a question asked to him by Chris Wallace too. Packing the courts is what the dems said they would do. Schumer, Pelosi, AOC +3. Yet RBG was against it. If he's "the democratic party", what do you think he's going to do? He just won't admit it.
shareHe told him to shut up because he kept interrupting whenever Biden was addressing the questions asked by the moderator. Why? Because Trump didn't have any coherent answers to the questions, so he tried to distract everyone.
That's why he rightfully told him to shut up - and that's when he won the debate.
Isn't that easy ? Now nod your head and say d'oh!
And why was he interrupting him in the first place? Because he failed to answer the question that Chris Wallace asked him. So Trump pressed him on it and he crumbled. It's a good thing Chris Wallace bailed him out on that one, yes?
You can't say, "Free Tibet" either, yes?
And why was he interrupting him in the first place?
The answer to your question is already in my post. I forgot you're autistic, so I will help you with this one:
It's the sentence which comes after the question 'Why?' (see, I could foresee you asking this question because you're an idiot).
Isn't that easy ? Now nod your head and say "Auntie Maryanne was right! I am a public moron!" share
I know that English isn't your first language, so I'll give you a pass on the comprehension.
Nevertheless, why can't you say, "Free Tibet"? How much trouble would you be in if you said it?
Now nod your head and say "Auntie Maryanne was right! I am a public moron!"
shareWhy won't you say "Free Hong Kong" or "Save the Whales"? Oh, you haven't... you must be against those things then, yes? Your "Free Tibet" litmus test is yet another attempt to reframe the discussion away from anything actually being discussed. Why don't you start a thread about Tibet if you feel so strongly about it? OH, it's because you don't actually care about it unless you think there is some tribal partisan advantage to be milked out of it. I'd be more than happy to join you in condemning the C.C.P. behavior in many parts of the world if you actually cared enough to start a thread about that subject. So far you haven't, though. So for the time being I'll assume you are full of shit.
shareThank you little Christopher. You passed! Youโre not a 50 cent komrade.
Now tell me. How can you have a discussion with a member of the 50 cent army? Now tell me. How can you buy the propaganda that these idiots constantly spew? Pray tell?
Itโs only obvious they want Biden to win because heโs already bought. You know heโll lift the tariffs on them.
Donโt you want the US to be independent of China?
America is heading for heading for ever increasing conflict and tension with China now matter who the president is. The relationship is deteriorating and will continue to do so. We are natural rivals in the Pacific just as Russia and Japan before them.
shareAnd who is better to get us out of Chinese control? What are the Trump tariffs for? For the hell of it?
So tell me. How can you be for Biden to lead the US?
Biden is an infinitely better choice because he is more likely than Trump to build coalitions and do the diplomatic work to get other countries on board. You know, countries like India, which Trump just accused last night (without supplying the least evidence) of covering up the coronavirus just as China did. Or countries like Nepal (one of his "shithole countries, no doubt, and suffering territorial encroachments by China) which Trump mispronounces as "Nipple" - for a laugh or out of ignorance, take your pick. Trump was praising Xi and sucking his dick about the handling the virus well (and Hong Kong, too) right up until the moment people over here started dropping dead. Besides, I thought Obama/Clinton/Biden were all a bunch of Deep State warmongers. Conflict with China is much better for the defense industry than fighting brush wars in the Middle East or even keeping up with Putin's decrepit military. So, if you're right (and ever really believed it in the first place), then you have no need to fear. Biden will confirm to the pattern of American history and China will become the new enemy as it already is becoming.
shareDisagree with everything you said.
Start in the Middle East. Peace treaties are a benefit for the region and the US. I fail to see how you donโt acknowledge that.
How you fail to see Iran constantly threatening the US and Biden wanting to reimplement the Iran nuclear deal is a joke. Why you want to directly fund terrorism ala the Obama administration, makes zero sense.
China, what the hell do you expect him to say on the political stage? That Xi is an asshole dictator who we owe a trillion dollars too? How stupid is that? No reason to give him more beneficial deals.
How you think Biden can get anything done is beyond me. What has he done in his 47 years in the government other than get rich? Pray tell?
"Start in the Middle East. Peace treaties are a benefit for the region and the US. I fail to see how you donโt acknowledge that."
Well, one of our absolute worst presidents (Carter) managed to get a peace treaty with between Israel and Egypt signed. That didn't make him effective overall on the world stage either.
"How you fail to see Iran constantly threatening the US and Biden wanting to reimplement the Iran nuclear deal is a joke. Why you want to directly fund terrorism ala the Obama administration, makes zero sense."
So, we walked out of the nuclear deal despite our allies thinking it wasn't a good idea, and still don't. Meaning deals we make aren't worth spit and we expect our allies to toe the line and do what we tell them. A too aggressive posture with Iran and Syria might get you a war with Russian you were claiming Hilary Clinton was going to get us into. I believe the Russians are serious about keeping their ports in Syria (they have a warm water port fixation).
"China, what the hell do you expect him to say on the political stage? That Xi is an asshole dictator who we owe a trillion dollars too? How stupid is that? No reason to give him more beneficial deals."
So why talk about Tibet then? There is literally no reason for us to support Hong Kong or Tibet (especially Tibet), as there is no economic benefit for us to do so. If it is a moral issue (in part), then it should be acknowledged as such, otherwise why pretend we care about Tibet. That just makes us come across as phony and opportunistic.
I'm glad to hear you acknowledge Carter was one of our worst Presidents. That's a start. Also, it took me to mention the peace deals Trump brokered for you to acknowledge it. That's ignorance on your part. In regards to Carter, he failed on so many other issues, which makes him one of the worst Presidents.
Which allies are you referring too about the Iran Nuclear deal?
When did Russia take over the Crimea? During Obama's admin, wasn't it? What did that admin do about it? Nothing. What did they do to prevent it? Nothing. Instead, what did the Obama admin do? They took out Khaddafi. Wow! He wasn't even a player anymore and it caused a monster wave of refugees into the EU that they weren't able to sustain. Good job Clinton!
Too aggressive? Peace through strength. Instead, the Obama admin gave them billions and funded their terror cells. ISIS arose because of Obama pulled out too soon. You want US dollars to directly fund terrorism?
You have no clue what Free Hong Kong and Free Tibet means. You don't know what the 50 cent army is. You're completely clueless. Try to pay attention next time before jumping into a conversation you have absolutely no clue what is going on. You'll look less stupid next time.
"You have no clue what Free Hong Kong and Free Tibet means."
You didn't care about these issues until yesterday, as far as I can tell. When did it suddenly occur to you this was the greatest issue of our time? What caused it to pop into your mind, exactly? Why would a debate consisting of two old guys yelling at each other prompt you to decide now was the time? As a matter of fact, it was like pulling teeth to get anyone around here to say anything concerning Hong Kong during the big protests last year. Now you suddenly are concerned about Hong Kong? A little late now, wouldn't you say? Where were you when they cancelled the elections in Hong Kong? The only election you care about is the one in the United States.
"Good job, Clinton"
I personally abstained from the 2016 for precisely that reason. I can't speak for anyone else on here, though. Your the one that is trying to lump everyone that doesn't like Trump together.
"Which allies are you referring too about the Iran Nuclear deal?"
Good question. Which ones?
I notice how you failed to address anything else I said. Instead, you continue with your dense and clueless attack where you know nothing of my motives, you know nothing of the 50 cent army, nor do you do any due diligence on your own to enlighten yourself. Only an ignoramus would do what you are doing and yet, like the white guilt and white privileged ultraviolet, that has not donated any of his ill-gotten privileged wealth, you are narrow-minded in determined to win an argument when you ignorance prevents you from it.
You and ultralite are same. Narrow-minded. Pig-headed. Unenlightened. Ignorant. Then again, what else is new?
Tell us more about this crazy dream you had.
shareIf he apologized then he would come across as a "pussy".
share