What prevents a democracy from becoming an autocracy?
Try to answer the riddle. There is a correct answer.
shareTry to answer the riddle. There is a correct answer.
shareReal educated people or just common sense.
shareNope. It's not uncommon for educated people or those with common sense to be targeted by an autocrat after he gained power.
shareBut you are using your comparsion of people you know of as unarmed. Some others would say they aren't educated or have common sense.The constitution specifically the 2nd admendment part prevents autocract from forming.
shareThe riddle isn't limited to the U.S.
A constitution doesn't prevent a dictatorship or autocracy because autocrats will either ignore or change the constitution.
A recent example is Putin who only a few weeks ago announced he wants to change the Russian constitution in an attempt to hold on to power.
Armed civilians is not correct. Many autocrats are actually popular and well-liked. Most have 30-40 percent favorable support.
Also most citizens are unaware that their democracy is under threat when it's happening.
The People are the ONLY guarantee against any kind of tyranny. but by 'the people' I mean an enlightened populace. We are so far from that it's not even funny.
shareNope re: your answer especially the "ONLY guarantee" part.
I agree that our populace isn't enlightened. But, that's likely by design.
By getting money out of politics. By choosing Bernie over Biden, Buttigieg, Klobuchar and most certainly Bloomberg and Steyer.
shareYour answers are interesting. Not correct though.
"By getting money out of politics."
Money is part of what can help an autocrat/extremist/demogogue gain power: Citizens United, billionaires, rich sponsors, campaign finance laws and grassroots fundraising esp. in the U.S..
But even with money, there is still a way to prevent him from gaining power. Once he has it, preventing an autocracy.
"By choosing Bernie over Biden, Buttigieg, Klobuchar and most certainly Bloomberg and Steyer.
Answer not limited to the U.S..
Hint 1: "By choosing" has to do with preventing him from gaining power. By choosing what and by whom?
Hint 2: It was done successfully in the past in the U.S.. More recently in foreign countries.
you aren't clever. its a multifaceted issues. nothing is ever "one thing". only a simpleton who hasn't taken political science (or any higher learning) would think something as complex as this is a single thing
shareThe answer is from political scientist(s).
Not even a guess? Feel free to give your complex answer.
I would argue there are multiple ways to prevent it. Perhaps you are referencing some last resort, such as a threat of anarchy.
Your overall question seems to ask 'how do we keep a democracy a democracy?' One way is if the population threatens to rebuild the whole thing from scratch if the majority loses its voice.
"threat of anarchy"
If you mean from the public? Nope. Autocrats, especially populists can have huge public support. The answer isn't the public. Not the population threatening anarchy nor destruction.
The riddle asks "what" prevents..." There are two fail-safe ways to prevent a democracy from turning into an autocracy. If the first way fails then there's still a last resort, hopefully long before democracy has been subverted. It's the "what" that would or could use the "fail-safe ways".
"if the majority loses its voice."
Do you mean the majority of people? Is any majority likely to lose its voice if they are usually the ones who have power in a democracy?
Above are a few vague hints without giving it away.
Another hint: The answer's obvious, but something most people probably don't think about as a protection against autocracy even though observable and commented about by many Americans especially nowadays because of what's going wrong.
there isnt a single correct answer because there isn't a single correct means or way autocrats take power.
-sometimes its a small dedicated armed ban who seizes power
-sometimes a majority of the population support them
-sometimes they take power under the guise of a democratic party
-sometimes they admit they are going to be a strongman
-sometimes the seizing of power is over a short period of time
-sometimes its a slow steady securing of power through a thousand cuts.
so please explain to me Francis Fukuyama how there's one answer.
"-sometimes its a small dedicated armed ban who seizes power"
True. During the Cold War, 3/4 of democracies ended in a coup or coercion. Furthermore, most governments became an obvious dictatorship like communism, fascism or military rule. Coups are rare now.
"-sometimes a majority of the population support them
-sometimes they take power under the guise of a democratic party
-sometimes they admit they are going to be a strongman
-sometimes the seizing of power is over a short period of time
-sometimes its a slow steady securing of power through a thousand cuts."
All true. You listed the ways a democracy normally ends now.
"how there's one answer."
What's been the common denominator or main way an autocrat/demagogue/extremist, etc. is prevented from gaining power or subverting democracy once in power?
Take a guess. You may be right.
Not allowing the head of state to make his/her own rules would be a start.
We are all fallible. The state cannot be one person.