MovieChat Forums > Politics > The Right begins to devour itself

The Right begins to devour itself

posted 5 years ago by Neckk (342)
18 replies | jump to latest

It's interesting when a 20 year old white nationalist sparks a civil war and begins to expose the hypocrisy within the right-wing party. I will never support Nick Fuentes due to his prejudices to non-whites, but I can appreciate him calling out Charlie Kirk (TPUSA) and the like for their hypocrisy regarding Israel. For example, the fact that it's illegal to protest products coming from Israel in Florida is ridiculous. In addition, TPUSA (who are supposedly fighting for free speech) have stopped doing Q and A's in fear of being asked certain questions.

Despite the title of my post, overall, this isn't a left-wing or right-wing issue, it's a truth issue, and TPUSA are further being exposed as they should be.

[–] Sandman27 (3043) 5 years ago

Then I guess you have nothing to worry about then. Carry on comrade.

[–] ultravioletx (10237) 5 years ago

Turning Point has always been a propaganda outfit though. Its kinda laughable to think Turning Point cared about free speech when every action they made involved silencing someone's opinions.

[–] Sandman27 (3043) 5 years ago

Its kinda laughable to think Turning Point cared about free speech when every action they made involved silencing someone's opinions.

EVERY action? Seriously?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1tRhC_QTpfY

[–] ultravioletx (10237) 5 years ago

Its whole purpose for existing was to shut up college professors.

[–] Sandman27 (3043) 5 years ago

Shut up college professors? If this is true, how exactly were they going to accomplish this?

[–] ultravioletx (10237) 5 years ago

You could have a point. I can't know what is in Charlie Kirk's head. I can only judge his behavior. Turning Point could be pulling a scam on its donors by merely pretending to care about college professors.

[–] Sandman27 (3043) 5 years ago

TPUSA was CREATED to shut up professors as you claim, but now you don't know what they were created for? Do you even know what you're even talking about?

[–] ultravioletx (10237) 5 years ago

All we can do is judge people by their actions. We can never know whats in their heads, especially when it comes to individuals such as Charlie Kirk and Candace Owens.

For example, Candace was just on Ingraham's show saying racism wasn't an issue until Obama was elected.

Yet in 2007 her family received a $35,000 settlement from the city because of racist teens. Weird huh.

[–] Neckk (342) 5 years ago

I used to like Candice Owens, but I saw the example you cited on TV today and revealed herself to be a hypocrite. She also took 6 weeks off from school due to racially charged harassment. Complete hypocrite when she says "white supremacy" isn't a problem.

[–] Sandman27 (3043) 5 years ago

What do you think is a greater problem to the nation. White supremacy or a partisan mainstream media?

[–] Neckk (342) 5 years ago

"What do you think is a greater problem to the nation. White supremacy or a partisan mainstream media?"

A partisan mainstream media, definitely.

[–] Sandman27 (3043) 5 years ago

Thank you.

[–] Sandman27 (3043) 5 years ago

What the hell are you talking about? You're just spewing junk with absolutely no coherence. How are they shutting up college professors? Just answer the question imposed.

[–] Neckk (342) 5 years ago

Ultravioletx, although I disagree with you on them ALWAYS being a propaganda outfit, I do think it is true as of late (with banning Nick Fuentes from their event and halting all Q and As). In my opinion, they started out strong, but eventually became shills who weren't allowed to criticize Israel for some reason.

EDIT: To clarify, I'm NO fan of Nick Fuentes, but still support his right to be heard regardless of him being a racist.

[–] ultravioletx (10237) 5 years ago

I agree about Nick Fuentes as well. There's no way to stop someone from speaking in racist terms in the US. But I also agree that an employer has the right to fire him and a platform has the right to drop him based on what he says.

[–] Sandman27 (3043) 5 years ago

Says the person that condones Anti-fa. If you believe what you say, then you'd denounce Anti-Fa from preventing right wing speakers from speaking and people from attending those lectures.

It is as clear as an azure sky that based off of your posts that you are a HYPOCRITE. However, let me give the chance to correct yourself. Denounce Anti-Fa and you'll be that much less a hypocrite and a better person in general.

[–] Sandman27 (3043) 5 years ago

Who's Nick Fuentes?

[–] Neckk (342) 5 years ago

Nick Fuentes has a youtube channel called America First. Most notable, IMO, he's against:

- ALL forms of immigration, but only if non-white
- Race mixing of any kind

He also believes ALL, (yes, ALL) non-whites will vote blue and simply doesn't believe non-whites can be conservatives and/or assimilate to American values. He's pretty much a white nationalist in that he wants to have America as white as possible.

I only posted his cons, but they're definitely deal breakers for me to become a fan or supporter of his.

Here's a link of an interview in case you're interested:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q-1Gqa_C6DU