MovieChat Forums > Politics > The 'Blackmail' Tapes may have evidence ...

The 'Blackmail' Tapes may have evidence against T-rump

posted 5 years ago by [deleted]
16 replies | jump to latest

Seems the question on everyone's - especially the rich and powerful men he 'palled' around with - is: Does Epstein have Blackmail tapes?

A few years ago, a woman named Virginia Roberts claimed the US authorities had videos of her from when she was a minor, having sex with powerful wealthy men who were friends with Jeffrey Epstein. Roberts claimed Epstein 'debriefed' her after she had sexual relations with his friends, so he would possess "intimate and potentially embarrassing information" that could be used for blackmail. Nothing moved forward on Roberts' claim at the time...until now.

The past week, news broke that after law enforcement searched Epstein's upper East Side Manhattan mansion last weekend, they found a locked safe filled with CDs and each labeled "[Young Girl's Name] + [Name of Wealthy Man]". At least one woman has come forward over the years and said she had sex at Epstein's apartment with T-rump (before he was President) and that she believed there was video evidence of this. (T-rump has denied the claim).

Aside from T-rump, Bill Clinton, Woody Allen and Prince Andrew (whom another young girl has said she had sex with; the Royal Family has denied this) were known to frequent his home.

This could be the evidence T-rump can be worried about - or will just deny when it surfaces.

[–] eYeDEF (5050) 5 years ago

The thing people need to realize the Trump smoking gun in the Epstein matter was known to us in 2016. It’s the alleged rape by Trump of a 13 year old girl in 1994 at an Epstein party. The woman filed suit and it was set to go to trial in December 2016 before Trump won. At that point she voluntarily dropped her suit. It's not a leap to surmise she withdrew after death threats being made to her in person by the same kind of goons who threatened Stormy Daniels.

Conventional wisdom is that the reason Epstein kept bragging to mutual associates that it was he who introduced Trump to Melania, whether it's true or not, is to make a not-so-subtle threat to Trump to keep him protected because he holds the goods on him. We'll see if that holds up.

[–] [deleted] 5 years ago

Oh please let Epstein crack like an egg! Oh please!

But no matter what he has on T-rump, his supporters will still stand by him. He could very well be guilty of this alleged rape -and evidence to prove it - but his base and the GOP will stand by him.

[–] eYeDEF (5050) 5 years ago

Sad but too true. He could rape a small boy or the carcass of a dead girl on 5th Ave broadcast on live TV and his disciples would like him even more. They're sick people.

[–] [deleted] 5 years ago

They really are a sick group. They see nothing wrong with paedophelia, child abuse or locking up toddlers in cages. Yet they pretend to be 'right to life'rs.

[–] Sandoz (2021) 5 years ago

I saw an interview with David Korn (as anti-Trump as a journalist can be) and he disputed the veracity of the rape claim in 2016 made against Trump. He was one of a huge group of reporters who tried to run down this story to prove even circumstantially something to bolster this claim with no success. But I haven't heard if the woman involved in this has ever commented since then about it...maybe they'll be new info yet to come due to Epstein 2019.

[–] eYeDEF (5050) 5 years ago

I read some articles questioning the veracity of the claim too, but they were mostly focused on the entourage of those promoting the story and bringing up their questionable cred. There were some real circus promoters surrounding that affair. But one of the alleged victim's attorneys is on record saying she withdrew her complaint due to death threats.

But with the NY Times story recently breaking about the party at Mar-a-Lago in 1992 attended by just Trump, Epstein, and 28 girls Epstein had flown in (without anything explicit about them being under age, but with the innuendo that some certainly were) because they interviewed the promoter that set it up, it does lend new credibility to the 1994 claim.

[–] Sandoz (2021) 5 years ago

There's a lot more about that Mar-a-lago 1992 party yet to be revealed that has the potential to mushroom into something really big. Since it involves Epstein and girls, it will have to be investigated no matter that the President was there, too. With a guestlist of 28 girls, it shouldn't be too difficult to find a bunch who will talk.

[–] [deleted] 5 years ago

T-rump's going to say this event never happened, or he was not part of this event. His supporters and the Republican party will back him up on either excuse with no further questions - case closed.

[–] jimmyjuliano (223) 5 years ago

you loons just love grasping at any little hope you may have dont ya?! these last 2 and a half years have been some of the best of my life! seeing you people latch on to any last little bit of hope, getting erections because someone claims to have found something in the constitution that says eating big macs on a plane is an impeachable offence, or maybe you can get him with this or with that... and it never pans out does it?

why don't you get your house in order, run a candidate with some ideas? instead of identity politics and calling everyone racist and these little immature plans to impeach that dont hold water to get someone out of office, just because you don't like him?

by the way, 99.9% of the time these pedos are libs. FACT!

[–] Sandoz (2021) 5 years ago

"by the way, 99.9% of the time these pedos are libs. FACT!"

I'd really like to tell you what else is a FACT... but I've been warned by the Mods not to ruffle the delicate lil' feathers of you sensitive tweety-birds by unleashing some vitriolic insults.

[–] jimmyjuliano (223) 5 years ago

you must be on drugs

[–] Sandoz (2021) 5 years ago

I'm still smarter on Ambien than you are on Meth.

[–] [deleted] 5 years ago

One of the best answers I've read in a long time. LMAO!

[–] eYeDEF (5050) 5 years ago

So why do the most high profile pedos turn out to be Republicans?

[–] [deleted] 5 years ago

And T-rump backs each one up?

[–] [deleted] 5 years ago

Right? I mean T-rump barely knows Epstein, anyhow! He may have said 'hello' to him passing him by in front of T-rump Tower thirty years ago, but my God - T-rump wouldn't know him if he slapped him in the face today. Don't believe anything he said in the past about him being a 'great guy' - that was another Jeffrey Epstein and the media has turned it all around. Fake news everyone!