Can't let the week end without revisiting T-rump's (now) infamous quote 'She's not my type' when asked if he raped his latest accuser in a long line of accusers.
So what woman is "his type" to rape? He didn't elaborate. Any T-rumpanzee want to answer for their messiah?
Can't let the week end without revisiting T-rump's (now) infamous quote 'She's not my type' when asked if he raped his latest accuser in a long line of accusers.
“I’ll say it with great respect: Number one, she’s not my type. Number two, it never happened. It never happened, OK?” Trump said in the interview, which was conducted in the Oval Office.
The president added that Carroll was “totally lying” when she made her claims.
“I know nothing about this woman. I know nothing about her,” he said.
Carroll’s account, revealed last week in an excerpt of her new book that was published by New York magazine...
Huh, all these years she had to wait for him to get famous enough to write her tawdry kiss and tell, the poor slut! reply share
Why is 'she's not my type' number one? His number one reason for defense? WTF? Why is it listed as one of his answers in the first place?
So we ask again - what is his type of woman to rape?
Let's not forget - he said he never met her and doesn't know her, yet photos of the two of them together prove what a serial liar he is (no surprise to anyone who follows anything but "breitbartnews" or FOX News).
Well I agree that "not my type" is kind of a weird response to a rape accusation questioning or maybe even rebuttal, but I don't think that alone proves much of anything else. He just really worded it in an insensitive way I guess.
He could've said, "I don't rape" or etc., but probably the implication of him was that he didn't need to make it clear he didn't/doesn't, whether or not he does/doesn't in any general sense of understanding.
I mean I'm no Trump fan or supporter to add, but that doesn't mean I have anything against him or solely dislike him.
A natural, immediate response from someone who is not a rapist would be something along the lines of “ I’m not a rapist”, not “ She’s not my type “. His response was that of someone who is guilty.
I get more of an entitled or insensitive vibe that portrays a demeanor of his insistence that he is automatically innocent or that he doesn't need to explain himself either way.
Some people who feel they're guilty might actually go out of their way to deny what they're accused of than to sidestep. Just him being a bit of a jerk/ass in ways doesn't guarantee the statements or claims against himself to be true.
What I'm saying in another way of words is that someone not admitting to not doing something doesn't mean they are absolutely guilty of it.
What I'm saying in another way of words is that someone not admitting to not doing something doesn't mean they are absolutely guilty of it.
I agree with you 100%. However, as President of the US - words have meaning. It's the way the admit their innocence which weighs heavily on the court of public opinion.
Bill Clinton's response to 'I did not have sex with that girl' opened the question 'How do you define sex' ? (He meant 'intercourse', not oral sex - which was laughed at.)
T-rump now says 'She's not my type' - which leaves the appropriate question of 'What is your type of woman to rape?'
Two odd ways to prove they're 'not guilty'.
reply share
ever noticed that whenever someone seems dangerous to the establishment, a string of women come followed and say something happened? berlusconi in italy, herman cain (they couldn't play the race card) now trump..... (and many more)
but when the left gets what it wants and these people "go away" or they win, that the lawsuits goes away too? but at the same time when people like weiner and weinstein get caught with their pants around their ankles theres pretty much silence?
you should change the t-shirts to "BELIEVE WOMEN (who just happen to accuse republicans and conversvatives right before elections)"
you'd need big t-shirts for all those words, but liberal "women" are usually fat sloppy messes....
ever noticed that whenever someone seems dangerous to the establishment, a string of women come followed and say something happened? berlusconi in italy, herman cain (they couldn't play the race card) now trump..... (and many more)
but when the left gets what it wants and these people "go away" or they win, that the lawsuits goes away too? but at the same time when people like weiner and weinstein get caught with their pants around their ankles theres pretty much silence?
No, because it never happens that way.
reply share