He crashed into a house and could have killed innocent people.You mean that barn/woodshed thing? https://youtu.be/gLlZsi_7Mvg?t=3m29s
Yeah, people wouldn't likely live there.
Rome, it cannot be that emptyYou mean that chase where they show at least six other driven cars and countless parked ones, where Bond runs into another driver and also a parked car? https://youtu.be/gKOq-AqPF5Q?t=3m16s
How much more showing of Bond colliding with pedestrians do you require?
To be fair, I do think they are going for a sparse, focused stylistic Bondverse onscreen throughout SP. They did the large crowd stuff in Mexico, but still turn it into a surrealistic drill down on Bond walking across the cityscape in broad daylight with a Glock 17 without attracting attention, etc. Is it like "real life?" No not really. I would say they are going for a fantasy style throughout...thematically to tie to Bond motifs such as SPECTRE having volcanoes but Japan not noticing and Drax having space shuttle fleets and nobody noticing and Islands and space stations and empty Rio gondolas and empty excursions to the pyramids and empty trains in the underground etc. Bond careening through New York and Paris and so on and nobody ever getting hurt.
Is it the way the real world looks? Not quite. Its fantasyland that allows us to focus on our adventure.
Sometimes the style is different and we get junkanoos and collateral damage during horse races in Spain and different FULL trains in the underground etc. Im not sure that stuff makes it all better, though I would agree with anyone who thinks that such "crowd" theming makes the Bond story or even mere scene feel more grounded and less mythic, and vice versa. And some folks prefer one or the other.
The train fight scene was great but how can no one hear the gunshots and the fight? The police would have showed up. Perhaps they did. Perhaps Bond even had to put in a call to M to pull strings to "get away with it" as is the typical glossed over storypoint here. Or perhaps they went to pains to show you that the bullets didn't fire until they were isolated in a cargo car, on a clearly less than full train...where the people seemed to not want to spectate but instead flee. Thus, maybe nobody heard so now its just a fight/mess not even a murder which Bond might gloss over with a bribe etc. There are too many Bondly ways out of this quagmire to even count.
The real question is: you have a choice between wanting to watch Bond make cell phone calls to clean up logistics...or have his love scene. It's really up to you which one you wanted to see more, and which one you'd edit out.
How can Bond find the secret room at the Hotel? They showed you.
Why did Bond take the ring out in the helicopter?He noticed its significance to the other folks in the Sciarra meeting he just spied on through his scope. So, its shown a clue with ties to the bad guys he's investigating, not just any old ring. Not to mention, its weird, like, say, a Tong symbol tattoo. And Bond is a bit prescient at times; at least he has instincts etc that kick in (and out).
These don't really qualify as very confusing; it seems you didn't like it and want to act as if things were incomprehensible so as to justify. But, honestly, such "analysis" tells more about the analyzer than the product. There are better ways to lead to a punchline that a given movie is not as good as some other movies to you.
Now, this is a signature gun, and that is an optical palm reader.
reply
share